Re: Re: [qmailtoaster] Reply to Address

2008-10-13 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Looks like the domain name may be in locals. Erik On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, Yea I just tested that Ok here is what I have now. I have to 3200 users sitting on a 64 bit box. I have disabled spamdyke and am now requiring [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] courier-authlib-toaster cant fing installed dependancy

2008-10-20 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
yum install libtool-ltdl-devel Erik On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Gregory Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I'm have switched to fedora 8 i386 in the hope that the toaster would work . not quite .. I'm still suffering ... please can someone help .. courier-authlib-toaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav 0.94.1 availability

2008-11-08 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Tonight. QA'ing the package still. EE On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EE, any guess when this might be available (for QMT)? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] (another) Vulnerability in clamav

2008-11-17 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
New clamav is released on the main page. Erik On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:58 PM, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, For our own common interest: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32207/discuss ClamAV is prone to an off-by-one heap-based buffer-overflow vulnerability

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav 0.94.2 availability

2008-12-02 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Probably in the next couple of days. Still testing. Erik On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:45 PM, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AFAIK 0.94.2 doesn't fix any security issues nor any major enhancement of any kind. The more relevant issues that this release fixes is building in AIX and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Distro Question

2009-08-20 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
--with cnt50 compile options for the rpmbuild commands. Erik On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Mike Cantym...@collotype.com.au wrote: Jake,        Thank you.  Yes I knew CentOS is really RedHat, but I just wanted to know that some elements were not omitted.  Now that I know, excellent. Can

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtprune

2009-09-10 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Wow! I'm just surprised people still use qtprune. Erik On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: That might be as a result of not having everything under INBOX with dovecot. I'll try to have a look at it tomorrow. Phil Leinhauser wrote: OK, I found the

<    1   2   3   4