Hey thanks
and yeah - that would be based on https://hub.docker.com/_/rockylinux
(https://hub.docker.com/_/rockylinux)
which is maintained by Rocky Linux
I think it would be solid
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
February 20, 2024 9:23 AM, "Remo Mattei" mailto:r...@
You can probably setup QMail toaster under docker, it would negate any arguments
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
February 19, 2024 8:26 AM, "Jeff Koch" mailto:jeffk...@intersessions.com?to=%22Jeff%20Koch%22%20)>
wrote:
Hi - this is really OT but I trust the judgement
I'm using Letsencrypt and it renews every - well not sure, is it 10/11 weeks -
the certs are valid for 3 months
It never has an issue with iOS
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
April 27, 2022 1:47 AM, "Remo Mattei" wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I got a few of my customers
s may post. If you are a subscriber, please forward this
message to qmailtoaster-list-ow...@qmailtoaster.com to get your new address
included (#5.7.2)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path:
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 5, 2022 8:22 PM, "xaf" wr
@brayworth.com
xaf might comment
so close ... !
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 5, 2022 7:52 AM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)>
wrote:
It is in the patch
On 1/4/2022 2:42 PM, David Bray wrote: Hey Eric - sorry to
Hey Eric - sorry to direct to you - but authsenders - is this an option ?
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com (mailto:da...@brayworth.com)
January 4, 2022 9:56 PM, "xaf" mailto:x...@abaxe.net)> wrote:
Did you try authsenders?
https://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html##
-banned-sender-office-365)
As @brayworth (https://www.linode.com/community/user/brayworth) has indicated,
mailgun changes the headers, so if sending from a second domain you get the
fugly "on behalf of" in mail clients.
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 5, 2022 12:06 AM, &
Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 4, 2022 2:58 PM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)>
wrote:
All you're doing is relaying through another host.
On 1/3/2022 9:41 PM, David Bray wrote: and to answer the question
* yes, it is valid - b
domains ... [my assumption]
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 4, 2022 1:56 PM, "David Bray" mailto:da...@brayworth.com?to=%22David%20Bray%22%20)>
wrote:
Hi, Is this page valid
* http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Smtproutes
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.
through mailgun.com
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
Hey thanks
yeah - specifically not Hotmail/Outlook/Live, my bad - these are Microsoft 365
Business accounts, so typically a company who has a Microsoft Online Exchange
service
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 4, 2022 12:48 PM, "Angus McIntyre" wrote:
> My
in the process of chasing
that
but ... in the absense of a resolve there, its a major - change providors -
holy smoke - that's a big response
So I just thought I bounce here to see if others are in same (, Linode - or is
it a bigger,) boat ...
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
January 4, 2022 9
]/Giving_up_on_104.47.71.138./
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
/addr.1604880003.508496.28659: OK
~/var/qmail/simscan/1604880003.508496.28659/textfile0: OK
~/var/qmail/simscan/1604880003.508496.28659/textfile1: OK
Thanks in advance
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
for letting me bounce it off you
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
September 5, 2020 12:32 PM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)>
wrote:
I would think that this is a recipient server issue.
Is the CC'd address going to the same s
affect sending to the primary
recipient
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
September 3, 2020 2:00 PM, "David Bray" mailto:da...@brayworth.com?to=%22David%20Bray%22%20)>
wrote:
Hi
I have an issue where
* A client sends an email to a remote server
* and cc's a co
20200825.1020 Thu, 03 Sep 2020 06:57:02 +0300
Cheers
David Bray
e. da...@brayworth.com
Hey cool thanks for the dir listing
is the permissions critical here, noting that
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/master/dspamdb.sh
leaves the ownership as root.root and perms 644
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 23:29, Eric Broch wrote:
>
Thanks
My understanding of the beast just increased
Cheers
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 11:29, Eric Broch wrote:
> This is the contents of the .qmail-default (domain level) file that's
> existed since the beginning and never changed (directory:
>
they should be removed ..
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:53, Eric Broch wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> I never had double delivery and mine's been installed for 5 years or more.
>
> The install script installs only one dot qmail file (.qmail-default), an
up of delivery ...
if you remove the file, the problem goes away
so at best it needs to be carefully monitored, but it is still effective
but the newer scripted install does a pretty good job with spamassassin
anyway ... so I've disabled it..
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Mon, 31 A
]/Maildir/
which results in a double up of delivery ...
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:53, Chris wrote:
> Working on extracting some clean logs. One thing I'm noticing is that the
> two repeats I've had recently were both from amazonses.com and were TL
Yes - this is spot on, the branding totally caught me by surprise.
and the recommended install path pushed this out.
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 07:26, Bill Silverstein wrote:
> I think the point is that he was surprised by the branding.
>
> I a
When I updated using the command
- yum --enablerepo=qmt-devel update
It updated qmailAdmin ... and it looks like this !
Is that intended ?
[image: image.png]
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
I think my issue was just that, it seems to have gone away since I updated
to latest version
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 2:19 am, Eric Broch wrote:
> Has anyone experienced timeouts on incoming connections from outlook.com?
>
>
> -
?: password fail ([^)]*) [^@]*@[^:]*:
spamdyke.*?: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE .*origin_ip:
origin_rdns:.*$
spamdyke.*?: DENIED_RDNS_MISSING .*origin_ip:
origin_rdns:.*$
Thanks to those that replied
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 11:17, David Bray
I make up a composite certificate and
include lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem.txt
https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/
I'm not sure if I still need to, but I must have at some stage
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 19:38, ChandranManikandan wrote:
>
no - but vchkpw, also spamdyke does
so this is blocking people that are providing bad passwords etc ...
but agree, still trying to work out who is doing something other than this
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 11:15, Remo Mattei wrote:
> qmail does not log
Could I ask you command line for recordio
Thanks in advance
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 23:40, Eric Broch wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I think you're on to something with fail2ban (keying off maillog). I was
> monitoring my smtps port (watch
/maillog is all silent
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 00:06, Jaime Lerner
wrote:
> David,
>
>
>
> You might try the suggestions here:
> https://www.taverner-rich.com/mitigating-brute-force-attacks/
>
>
>
> I put them in place
discover there, thanks Remo/Andy
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:46, wrote:
> The other is to leverage some of Andy’s suggestions and use tcpdump on
> that port and see
>
> > Il giorno 21 apr 2020, alle ore 16:40, Andrew Swartz <
> awswa.
Thankfully CentOS 7 using 1.0.2k so not affected - thanks for the tip though
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:40, Andrew Swartz wrote:
> David,
>
> I just received this OpenSSL security advisory which may be describing
> your problem. It descri
Hi Eric - was that for Andy or me
I'm on
- qmail-1.03-3.1.1.qt.el7.x86_64
- qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.el7.x86_64
- qmailmrtg-4.2-3.qt.el7.x86_64
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 23:34, Eric Broch wrote:
> Andy,
>
> May I ask what version
./
What would it look like in my logs if they where to have the reverse issue
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 02:54, Andrew Swartz wrote:
> Port 465 should be SMTP over SSL/TLS. Therefore the sequence of events is:
>
> 1. Establish TCP connection
, they are bad because ... *what is the because* ?
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 15:32, Remo Mattei wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you reach the server? It maybe blocking you. So what does your queue
> looks like?
>
> Here is mine for example:
>
> # qmHandle
er: ok 29740
dev.brayworth.com:172.105.181.18:465
:185.50.149.5::19686
2020-04-20 05:08:13.601336500 tcpserver: end 29690 status 256
2020-04-20 05:08:13.601337500 tcpserver: status: 10/60
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 10:04, David Bray wrote:
> Thanks Eric
to
process it and have expanded on this now
I've been running email servers most of my working life and still get
tripped up by simple stuff
Thank for your efforts in this area, it helps to talk things out
cheers
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 01:12, Eric Broch
4/20 8:04 pm, Tony White wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >> Try using this little script...
> >>
> >> -- snip --
> >> #!/bin/bash
> >> logf="/var/log/blockip.log"
> >> mdate=`date +%c`
> >> mip=$1
> &g
.98.80.30
>
> https://linux-audit.com/blocking-ip-addresses-in-linux-with-iptables/
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:49 PM David Bray wrote:
>
>> sure - thanks for replying, this comes in waves taking the server to it's
>> maximum at times
>>
>> as far as I can see t
713500 tcpserver: status: 8/60
2020-04-18 05:06:05.965715500 tcpserver: end 13342 status 256
2020-04-18 05:06:05.965716500 tcpserver: status: 7/60
2020-04-18 05:06:06.141272500 tcpserver: end 13340 status 256
2020-04-18 05:06:06.141273500 tcpserver: status: 6/60
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
O
and pop failures
thanks in advance
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
Hi
I'm not sure about a tool, but the information is in the dovecot log
- tail /var/log/dovecot.log
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 13:58, ChandranManikandan wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I hope you are well
>
> Now everyone is WFH,
> So i woul
:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure;_connected_to_209.222.82.135./
I checked with ckecktls their server and it seems to be a barracuda setup
- d66963a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
[209.222.82.141:25]
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
- are they necessary for a mail server ?
David Bray
0418 745334
2 ∞ & <
after logic is my choice - I use the lite - http://www.afterlogic.org/
Its equally as easy as round cube to setup
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
/*Done* is better than *Perfect*/
On 7/12/2012 3:24 AM, Diana Calder wrote:
Anyone using something other than
* /var/qmail/control/dkim/signconf.xml = domain.tld
if that makes sense ...
--
*David Bray*
w. http://www.brayworth.com.au
m. 0418 745334
e. da...@brayworth.com.au
/PS: I don't trust the cloud .../
Hi
Hey when you send an image through a mail server this is the rule that's triggered ..
1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words
It's enough to trigger my spam defences ..
On 28/06/2012 10:14 AM, Cecil Yother,
Jr. wrote:
Thanks for that - Linode is definitely my next one - I'll wait because I
assume the Fedora 15 will be available soon now it is released
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 25/05/2011 3:59 AM, Postmaster wrote:
I suggested Linode! I used to run Qmail on 384Mb RAM
had the keys to the
house and was at least an electrician and assuring him it wasn't that
hard - hey how bad is not working at all. .
Now - I have no hardware - was it Forest Gump who said, one less thing
to worry about
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
I know - but of the toaster recipes - this is one that works for VPS.
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 26/05/2011 9:42 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Interesting, David. Thanks.
Doesn't change my mind though. ;)
On 05/25/2011 04:36 PM, David Bray wrote:
Hi Eric
. I'm currently using a Westnet/iiNet VPS - because it is
close in Aus.
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 23/05/2011 11:56 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 05/23/2011 12:18 AM, Joselito Tapangan wrote:
I have a question regarding this QMAIL. Right now our current
I dread
the freshclam message (despite the large friendly letters ) DON'T PANIC!
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 3/05/2011 2:14 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Just to throw my 2-cents worth in here...
Binary packages are fine in a well-controlled environment
Thanks - looks good, good price ...
Their distributions look up to the minute too - will give one of these a
shot.
David Bray
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 1/05/2011 8:37 PM, Postmaster wrote:
Ref VMs try linode.com
Regards
Alex
there - will look at it when I have a chance
David Bray
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 1/05/2011 12:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 04/29/2011 10:23 PM, Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen wrote:
Am 30.04.2011 um 05:40 schrieb David Bray:
Thanks for the Feedback
Understand about
just done an install on Fedora 13 and deviated from the recipe with
SpamAssassin and Clam
Just curious ...
--
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
package
There doesn't seem to be any issue running 3.3 with this recipe - and
SpamA (and ClamAV) are packages that are always changing, the rest of
QMT seems quite static.
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 30/04/2011 11:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 04/29/2011
package you have to stop the services to free up
memory ... so having a recipe for utilizing then yum package is nice ...
which brings you back to your argument, Fedora 13 will only have a short
life for clamav updates via yum
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
simscan-toaster-*.src.rpm= no changes
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 18/04/2011 12:03 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 04/15/2011 07:33 PM, David Bray wrote:
Hi Martin
It does help to understand how this work, but I'm still left puzzled.
I can compile
will handle a change in kernel
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 16/04/2011 2:55 AM, Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen wrote:
Am 15.04.2011 um 02:17 schrieb David Bray:
Did Jake have some thoughts on this - or should I just unpack, adjust the
patch switch
Did Jake have some thoughts on this - or should I just unpack, adjust
the patch switch and compile ? - any shortcuts ?
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 12/04/2011 12:59 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake can answer you question best. He manages the patch files.
I
platform
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 12/04/2011 12:59 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake can answer you question best. He manages the patch files.
I gotta ask though, why F13? F14 is current, and F15 release is right
around the corner (scheduled for 2011-05-24
or is there something else ?
Thanks in advance
--
*David Bray*
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
62 matches
Mail list logo