Re: [qmailtoaster] OT - Question about Rocky Linux

2024-02-19 Thread David Bray
Hey thanks and yeah - that would be based on https://hub.docker.com/_/rockylinux (https://hub.docker.com/_/rockylinux) which is maintained by Rocky Linux I think it would be solid Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com February 20, 2024 9:23 AM, "Remo Mattei" mailto:r...@

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT - Question about Rocky Linux

2024-02-19 Thread David Bray
You can probably setup QMail toaster under docker, it would negate any arguments Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com February 19, 2024 8:26 AM, "Jeff Koch" mailto:jeffk...@intersessions.com?to=%22Jeff%20Koch%22%20)> wrote: Hi - this is really OT but I trust the judgement

Re: [qmailtoaster] iPhone updates / new ssl breaks connection

2022-04-27 Thread David Bray
I'm using Letsencrypt and it renews every - well not sure, is it 10/11 weeks - the certs are valid for 3 months It never has an issue with iOS Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com April 27, 2022 1:47 AM, "Remo Mattei" wrote: > Hello guys, > I got a few of my customers

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-06 Thread David Bray
s may post. If you are a subscriber, please forward this message to qmailtoaster-list-ow...@qmailtoaster.com to get your new address included (#5.7.2) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 5, 2022 8:22 PM, "xaf" wr

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-04 Thread David Bray
@brayworth.com xaf might comment so close ... ! Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 5, 2022 7:52 AM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)> wrote: It is in the patch On 1/4/2022 2:42 PM, David Bray wrote: Hey Eric - sorry to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-04 Thread David Bray
Hey Eric - sorry to direct to you - but authsenders - is this an option ? Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com (mailto:da...@brayworth.com) January 4, 2022 9:56 PM, "xaf" mailto:x...@abaxe.net)> wrote: Did you try authsenders? https://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html##

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-04 Thread David Bray
-banned-sender-office-365) As @brayworth (https://www.linode.com/community/user/brayworth) has indicated, mailgun changes the headers, so if sending from a second domain you get the fugly "on behalf of" in mail clients. Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 5, 2022 12:06 AM, &

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 4, 2022 2:58 PM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)> wrote: All you're doing is relaying through another host. On 1/3/2022 9:41 PM, David Bray wrote: and to answer the question * yes, it is valid - b

Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
domains ... [my assumption] Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 4, 2022 1:56 PM, "David Bray" mailto:da...@brayworth.com?to=%22David%20Bray%22%20)> wrote: Hi, Is this page valid * http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Smtproutes (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.

[qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
through mailgun.com Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.511 Access denied, banned sender - Office 365

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
Hey thanks yeah - specifically not Hotmail/Outlook/Live, my bad - these are Microsoft 365 Business accounts, so typically a company who has a Microsoft Online Exchange service Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 4, 2022 12:48 PM, "Angus McIntyre" wrote: > My

Re: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.511 Access denied, banned sender - Office 365

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
in the process of chasing that but ... in the absense of a resolve there, its a major - change providors - holy smoke - that's a big response So I just thought I bounce here to see if others are in same (, Linode - or is it a bigger,) boat ... Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com January 4, 2022 9

[qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.511 Access denied, banned sender - Office 365

2022-01-03 Thread David Bray
]/Giving_up_on_104.47.71.138./ Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com

[qmailtoaster] Logwatch

2020-11-09 Thread David Bray
/addr.1604880003.508496.28659: OK ~/var/qmail/simscan/1604880003.508496.28659/textfile0: OK ~/var/qmail/simscan/1604880003.508496.28659/textfile1: OK Thanks in advance Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] 451_relay_not_permitted

2020-09-04 Thread David Bray
for letting me bounce it off you Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com September 5, 2020 12:32 PM, "Eric Broch" mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com?to=%22Eric%20Broch%22%20)> wrote: I would think that this is a recipient server issue. Is the CC'd address going to the same s

Re: [qmailtoaster] 451_relay_not_permitted

2020-09-04 Thread David Bray
affect sending to the primary recipient Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com September 3, 2020 2:00 PM, "David Bray" mailto:da...@brayworth.com?to=%22David%20Bray%22%20)> wrote: Hi I have an issue where * A client sends an email to a remote server * and cc's a co

[qmailtoaster] 451_relay_not_permitted

2020-09-02 Thread David Bray
20200825.1020 Thu, 03 Sep 2020 06:57:02 +0300 Cheers David Bray e. da...@brayworth.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-09-01 Thread David Bray
Hey cool thanks for the dir listing is the permissions critical here, noting that https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/master/dspamdb.sh leaves the ownership as root.root and perms 644 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 23:29, Eric Broch wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
Thanks My understanding of the beast just increased Cheers David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 11:29, Eric Broch wrote: > This is the contents of the .qmail-default (domain level) file that's > existed since the beginning and never changed (directory: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
they should be removed .. David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:53, Eric Broch wrote: > Hmmm... > > I never had double delivery and mine's been installed for 5 years or more. > > The install script installs only one dot qmail file (.qmail-default), an

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
up of delivery ... if you remove the file, the problem goes away so at best it needs to be carefully monitored, but it is still effective but the newer scripted install does a pretty good job with spamassassin anyway ... so I've disabled it.. David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 A

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Email delivery repeats

2020-08-04 Thread David Bray
]/Maildir/ which results in a double up of delivery ... David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:53, Chris wrote: > Working on extracting some clean logs. One thing I'm noticing is that the > two repeats I've had recently were both from amazonses.com and were TL

Re: [qmailtoaster] QMail Admin

2020-04-30 Thread David Bray
Yes - this is spot on, the branding totally caught me by surprise. and the recommended install path pushed this out. David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 07:26, Bill Silverstein wrote: > I think the point is that he was surprised by the branding. > > I a

[qmailtoaster] QMail Admin

2020-04-29 Thread David Bray
When I updated using the command - yum --enablerepo=qmt-devel update It updated qmailAdmin ... and it looks like this ! Is that intended ? [image: image.png] David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & <

Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook dot com

2020-04-29 Thread David Bray
I think my issue was just that, it seems to have gone away since I updated to latest version On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 2:19 am, Eric Broch wrote: > Has anyone experienced timeouts on incoming connections from outlook.com? > > > -

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-29 Thread David Bray
?: password fail ([^)]*) [^@]*@[^:]*: spamdyke.*?: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE .*origin_ip: origin_rdns:.*$ spamdyke.*?: DENIED_RDNS_MISSING .*origin_ip: origin_rdns:.*$ Thanks to those that replied David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 11:17, David Bray

Re: [qmailtoaster] letsencrypt certificate issue

2020-04-29 Thread David Bray
I make up a composite certificate and include lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem.txt https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/ I'm not sure if I still need to, but I must have at some stage David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 19:38, ChandranManikandan wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-22 Thread David Bray
no - but vchkpw, also spamdyke does so this is blocking people that are providing bad passwords etc ... but agree, still trying to work out who is doing something other than this David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 11:15, Remo Mattei wrote: > qmail does not log

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-22 Thread David Bray
Could I ask you command line for recordio Thanks in advance David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 23:40, Eric Broch wrote: > Hi David, > > I think you're on to something with fail2ban (keying off maillog). I was > monitoring my smtps port (watch

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-22 Thread David Bray
/maillog is all silent David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 00:06, Jaime Lerner wrote: > David, > > > > You might try the suggestions here: > https://www.taverner-rich.com/mitigating-brute-force-attacks/ > > > > I put them in place

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-21 Thread David Bray
discover there, thanks Remo/Andy David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:46, wrote: > The other is to leverage some of Andy’s suggestions and use tcpdump on > that port and see  > > > Il giorno 21 apr 2020, alle ore 16:40, Andrew Swartz < > awswa.

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-21 Thread David Bray
Thankfully CentOS 7 using 1.0.2k so not affected - thanks for the tip though David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:40, Andrew Swartz wrote: > David, > > I just received this OpenSSL security advisory which may be describing > your problem. It descri

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-21 Thread David Bray
Hi Eric - was that for Andy or me I'm on - qmail-1.03-3.1.1.qt.el7.x86_64 - qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.el7.x86_64 - qmailmrtg-4.2-3.qt.el7.x86_64 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 23:34, Eric Broch wrote: > Andy, > > May I ask what version

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-20 Thread David Bray
./ What would it look like in my logs if they where to have the reverse issue David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 02:54, Andrew Swartz wrote: > Port 465 should be SMTP over SSL/TLS. Therefore the sequence of events is: > > 1. Establish TCP connection

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-20 Thread David Bray
, they are bad because ... *what is the because* ? David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 15:32, Remo Mattei wrote: > Hi, > Can you reach the server? It maybe blocking you. So what does your queue > looks like? > > Here is mine for example: > > # qmHandle

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-19 Thread David Bray
er: ok 29740 dev.brayworth.com:172.105.181.18:465 :185.50.149.5::19686 2020-04-20 05:08:13.601336500 tcpserver: end 29690 status 256 2020-04-20 05:08:13.601337500 tcpserver: status: 10/60 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 10:04, David Bray wrote: > Thanks Eric

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-18 Thread David Bray
to process it and have expanded on this now I've been running email servers most of my working life and still get tripped up by simple stuff Thank for your efforts in this area, it helps to talk things out cheers David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 01:12, Eric Broch

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-18 Thread David Bray
4/20 8:04 pm, Tony White wrote: > > > >> Hi David, > >> Try using this little script... > >> > >> -- snip -- > >> #!/bin/bash > >> logf="/var/log/blockip.log" > >> mdate=`date +%c` > >> mip=$1 > &g

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-18 Thread David Bray
.98.80.30 > > https://linux-audit.com/blocking-ip-addresses-in-linux-with-iptables/ > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:49 PM David Bray wrote: > >> sure - thanks for replying, this comes in waves taking the server to it's >> maximum at times >> >> as far as I can see t

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-17 Thread David Bray
713500 tcpserver: status: 8/60 2020-04-18 05:06:05.965715500 tcpserver: end 13342 status 256 2020-04-18 05:06:05.965716500 tcpserver: status: 7/60 2020-04-18 05:06:06.141272500 tcpserver: end 13340 status 256 2020-04-18 05:06:06.141273500 tcpserver: status: 6/60 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < O

[qmailtoaster] SMTPS Port - Who is Failing ?

2020-04-17 Thread David Bray
and pop failures thanks in advance David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & <

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Login activity report

2020-04-14 Thread David Bray
Hi I'm not sure about a tool, but the information is in the dovecot log - tail /var/log/dovecot.log David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 13:58, ChandranManikandan wrote: > Hi Friends, > > I hope you are well > > Now everyone is WFH, > So i woul

[qmailtoaster] sslv3_alert_handshake_failure

2020-03-19 Thread David Bray
:SSL_routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3_alert_handshake_failure;_connected_to_209.222.82.135./ I checked with ckecktls their server and it seems to be a barracuda setup - d66963a.ess.barracudanetworks.com [209.222.82.141:25] David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & <

[qmailtoaster] MariaDB port - Firewall

2020-03-07 Thread David Bray
- are they necessary for a mail server ? David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & <

Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail alternatives? Looking for recs

2012-12-07 Thread David Bray
after logic is my choice - I use the lite - http://www.afterlogic.org/ Its equally as easy as round cube to setup *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au /*Done* is better than *Perfect*/ On 7/12/2012 3:24 AM, Diana Calder wrote: Anyone using something other than

[qmailtoaster] DKIM - What should be the Server Name be ?

2012-11-13 Thread David Bray
* /var/qmail/control/dkim/signconf.xml = domain.tld if that makes sense ... -- *David Bray* w. http://www.brayworth.com.au m. 0418 745334 e. da...@brayworth.com.au /PS: I don't trust the cloud .../

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: backup question

2012-07-01 Thread David Bray
Hi Hey when you send an image through a mail server this is the rule that's triggered .. 1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of words It's enough to trigger my spam defences .. On 28/06/2012 10:14 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmail and squirrelmail query

2011-05-25 Thread David Bray
Thanks for that - Linode is definitely my next one - I'll wait because I assume the Fedora 15 will be available soon now it is released *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 25/05/2011 3:59 AM, Postmaster wrote: I suggested Linode! I used to run Qmail on 384Mb RAM

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmail and squirrelmail query

2011-05-25 Thread David Bray
had the keys to the house and was at least an electrician and assuring him it wasn't that hard - hey how bad is not working at all. . Now - I have no hardware - was it Forest Gump who said, one less thing to worry about *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmail and squirrelmail query

2011-05-25 Thread David Bray
I know - but of the toaster recipes - this is one that works for VPS. *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 26/05/2011 9:42 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Interesting, David. Thanks. Doesn't change my mind though. ;) On 05/25/2011 04:36 PM, David Bray wrote: Hi Eric

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmail and squirrelmail query

2011-05-23 Thread David Bray
. I'm currently using a Westnet/iiNet VPS - because it is close in Aus. *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 23/05/2011 11:56 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 05/23/2011 12:18 AM, Joselito Tapangan wrote: I have a question regarding this QMAIL. Right now our current

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SpamAssassin Version

2011-05-03 Thread David Bray
I dread the freshclam message (despite the large friendly letters ) DON'T PANIC! *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 3/05/2011 2:14 AM, Dan McAllister wrote: Just to throw my 2-cents worth in here... Binary packages are fine in a well-controlled environment

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SpamAssassin Version

2011-05-02 Thread David Bray
Thanks - looks good, good price ... Their distributions look up to the minute too - will give one of these a shot. David Bray http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 1/05/2011 8:37 PM, Postmaster wrote: Ref VMs try linode.com Regards Alex

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SpamAssassin Version

2011-04-30 Thread David Bray
there - will look at it when I have a chance David Bray http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 1/05/2011 12:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/29/2011 10:23 PM, Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen wrote: Am 30.04.2011 um 05:40 schrieb David Bray: Thanks for the Feedback Understand about

[qmailtoaster] SpamAssassin Version

2011-04-29 Thread David Bray
just done an install on Fedora 13 and deviated from the recipe with SpamAssassin and Clam Just curious ... -- *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SpamAssassin Version

2011-04-29 Thread David Bray
package There doesn't seem to be any issue running 3.3 with this recipe - and SpamA (and ClamAV) are packages that are always changing, the rest of QMT seems quite static. *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 30/04/2011 11:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/29/2011

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SpamAssassin Version

2011-04-29 Thread David Bray
package you have to stop the services to free up memory ... so having a recipe for utilizing then yum package is nice ... which brings you back to your argument, Fedora 13 will only have a short life for clamav updates via yum *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: patch utility under Fedora 13

2011-04-17 Thread David Bray
simscan-toaster-*.src.rpm= no changes *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 18/04/2011 12:03 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/15/2011 07:33 PM, David Bray wrote: Hi Martin It does help to understand how this work, but I'm still left puzzled. I can compile

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: patch utility under Fedora 13

2011-04-15 Thread David Bray
will handle a change in kernel *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 16/04/2011 2:55 AM, Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen wrote: Am 15.04.2011 um 02:17 schrieb David Bray: Did Jake have some thoughts on this - or should I just unpack, adjust the patch switch

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: patch utility under Fedora 13

2011-04-14 Thread David Bray
Did Jake have some thoughts on this - or should I just unpack, adjust the patch switch and compile ? - any shortcuts ? *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 12/04/2011 12:59 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Jake can answer you question best. He manages the patch files. I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: patch utility under Fedora 13

2011-04-11 Thread David Bray
platform *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 12/04/2011 12:59 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Jake can answer you question best. He manages the patch files. I gotta ask though, why F13? F14 is current, and F15 release is right around the corner (scheduled for 2011-05-24

[qmailtoaster] patch utility under Fedora 13

2011-04-10 Thread David Bray
or is there something else ? Thanks in advance -- *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au