Johannes Weberhofer wrote:
> I have seen problems like that after replacing the server by a new one:
> When I falsely copied over the complete /home/vpopmail and /var/qmail
> directories from the old systems, I overwrote the newly compiled binaries
> on the target systems...
>
> Am 15.02.12 16:38,
I have seen problems like that after replacing the server by a new one: When I
falsely copied over the complete /home/vpopmail and /var/qmail directories from
the old systems, I overwrote the newly compiled binaries on the target
systems...
Johannes
Am 15.02.12 16:38, schrieb Dan McAllister:
I know I'm johnny-come-lately on this one, but have you checked to make
sure your filesystem (whichever one holds /tmp) isn't full?
I tend to get these errors when I've accidentally let /var (which is the
home of /var/tmp -- which is the target of my sym-link /tmp) get full
Dan
IT4SOHO
O
And the solution was ... raise the softlimit.
"But I thought we told you to raise the softlimit?" the assembled
members of qmailtoaster-list cried with one voice.
Well, yes. You did. And so did all the four hundred archive postings on
the subject.
But the secret, boys and girls, is that you h
Délsio Cabá wrote:
> Try to upgade gcc and recompite it again
gcc seems to be the latest approved version for CentOS. QMT was built with
that version.
I'm also having trouble with POP. The logs don't show any problems (except
for a 'status 256' response) but no mail is transferred.
When I manua
Hi,
Try to upgade gcc and recompite it again
On 15 February 2012 05:59, Angus McIntyre wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Unfortunately, even with a softlimit of 102400, it still gives the
> same error.
>
> Can you think of anything else I could try?
>
> Angus
>
>
> Délsio Cabá wrote:
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, even with a softlimit of 102400, it still gives the
same error.
Can you think of anything else I could try?
Angus
Délsio Cabá wrote:
> Hi,
> Try to raise even more.
> I had this issue also and I just raised the limit.
>
> I believe this one of the r
Hi,
Try to raise even more.
I had this issue also and I just raised the limit.
I believe this one of the reasons qmailtoaster will be distributed in rpm
packages
Regards
On 15 February 2012 05:32, Angus McIntyre wrote:
> I have a qmailtoaster install running on a 64-bit CentOS 5.7.
>
> As far
I have a qmailtoaster install running on a 64-bit CentOS 5.7.
As far as I can tell, almost all of it works correctly - mail is flowing
in and out successfully.
However, when I try to submit a message on port 587, the connection
closes. The log shows:
2012-02-14 22:26:16.919911500 tcpserver: ok 4
