Ok, here is Timo's response to my question:
Am 11.07.2010 um 21:01 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Waschbuesch wrote:
1.) Is there any danger regarding maildir consistency in directly moving
mail items about?
No. Assuming you use mv and not cp (and it's
Hi.
My experience was only when I deleted files.
I think dovecot does not complain if there are new files in the folder, but if
there are files missing, it complains.
I think it's normel that programs deliver mail into the folder, but normaly,
whitout dovecot no file is deleted. So dovecot
No, no vm, no nfs, all local
Andreas
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010 19:47:26 schrieb Jake Vickers:
On 07/08/2010 12:58 PM, Andreas Galatis wrote:
After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned
folder via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the
imap-connection was
Interesting,
I have a script that does just that (move files about in the maildir) and it
has not lead to problems yet. Though, I can definitely understand how it might
be problematic. I gotta watch out for that.
If you want to be on the safe side, I guess Eric's suggestion of using
dovecot's
Yes, it can be problematic. At the same time though, dovecot is very
robust, and is capable of recovering from inconsistencies such as this
automatically (all by itself). I would expect performance hits when
dovecot needs to rebuild indexes and such, but I would not expect a
failure of any
After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder
via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was
interrupted.
In the logs I see the error message saying time went back, therefore
dovecot was stopped.
The error message is false, time is not
I never have such problems with e.g. horde or Mail on Mac OS X.
Could that be IMAP client-related as well? But then I am investigating how to
replace my manual operations with dovecot's deliver. I don't want to end up
having such problems as well.
Martin
Am 08.07.2010 um 18:58 schrieb Andreas
Andreas Galatis wrote:
After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder
via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was
interrupted.
In the logs I see the error message saying time went back, therefore
dovecot was stopped.
The error message is
On 07/08/2010 12:58 PM, Andreas Galatis wrote:
After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder
via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was
interrupted.
In the logs I see the error message saying time went back, therefore
dovecot was
From what I read in the deliver documentation, it cannot (unlike maildrop) take
an email from standard input or a file? At least that is how I read the
documentation.
If that's true I do not see how it could be used for this type of scripting.
Anyone can confirm / correct my observation?
Martin
I haven't looked at the deliver documentation much, let alone recently.
I don't mean to sound like a broken record, but would you like to ask on
the dovecot list? (dove...@dovecot.org)
That list has been pretty active lately, and the people there are very
helpful.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Martin
You know, sometimes I am just way too slow it seems. :-)
Am 08.07.2010 um 20:29 schrieb Eric Shubert:
I haven't looked at the deliver documentation much, let alone recently.
I don't mean to sound like a broken record, but would you like to ask on the
dovecot list? (dove...@dovecot.org)
That
hi eric
when the email arrives in the spam box its headers contained the
delivered to email id in the header so my script will know where to
which email id the message is to be delivered. so my concern about bcc is
resolved.
my second question is as such
which would be better
Simply move the
Rajesh M wrote:
hi eric
when the email arrives in the spam box its headers contained the
delivered to email id in the header so my script will know where to
which email id the message is to be delivered. so my concern about bcc is
resolved.
my second question is as such
which would be better
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie between
5
and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the SPAM
folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail
my questions
1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox which will
Rajesh M wrote:
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie between
5
and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the SPAM
folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail
my questions
1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie between 5
and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the SPAM
folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail
my questions
1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox which will be
17 matches
Mail list logo
