On 6/8/06, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
nicola schrieb:> Why in the examples, we have the line:> var d = this.getClientWindow().getClientDocument(); ?> is not suffice: var d = this.getClientDocument(); ?Just a relict which isn't currently replaced. For simple widgets adds
you normal
Could you open a bug report and attach a simple demo file? That would be
really helpful. Thanks.
Sebastian
Marco Emiliozzi schrieb:
> Hi there.
>
> I've tested it in IE and Firefox.
>
> Regards
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto d
Hi there.
I've tested it in IE and Firefox.
Regards
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Sebastian
Werner
Inviato: giovedì 8 giugno 2006 13.44
A: Discuss the newest development of qooxdoo
Oggetto: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] R: QxComboBox fixes
Hi M
Hi Christian,
sorry for being so late, but better late than never ;)
On 6/8/06, Christian Boulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I now use the following code, which works:
[...]
> But it is hardly ideal because it produces a lot of useless objects...
> Maybe someone has a better way of doing this.
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your replay.
I think that my code works fine. after all it's just a copy of example
tree_5 from the test map. What I don't get is that a empty entry is plaeced
in the tree after a drop. But when i put an alert in front of the code al
works fine. It looks like that the al
