Hello Matthew,
yes, null would als work, as we do a simple check like "if (decorator) ...
{} ". But we decided to use undefined anywhere in the qx.theme namespace, so
it would be convenient to stay with it. ;-)
Cheers
Jonathan
-
Jonathan Weiß
Framework Engineer
http://mysterycity.de/blog
Does undefined work? I would have thought null would be a better option?
Jonathan Weiß wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
>
> overriding entries in your application's theme is the correct way to go. :-)
>
> What have you tried so far? You can remove a decorator by setting the value
> to undefined:
>
Hello Christian,
overriding entries in your application's theme is the correct way to go. :-)
What have you tried so far? You can remove a decorator by setting the value
to undefined:
qx.Theme.define("helloworld.theme.Appearance",
{
extend : qx.theme.modern.Appearance,
appearances :
{
Hello,
I am trying to get rid of the stylish gradient background image in the
toolbar and table headers which looks good in principle but gets old really
fast a complex UI with many toolbars and tables. I have experimented with
overriding entries in the Appeareance and Decoration classes in the "
