Bravo!. It works now.
Thanks once more.
Fabian Jakobs-2 wrote:
>
> I have changed the table so your renderer should work again. Can you
> verify that?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qooxdoo-0.7.2-planned-for-tomorrow-tf4474652.html#a12778153
Sent from the qooxdoo-
dperez schrieb:
> That's true. You have guessed!
> This is my simple custom renderer:
>
> qx.Class.define('CeldaBooleanaClicable', {
> extend: qx.ui.table.cellrenderer.Boolean,
>
> members: {
> _getCellStyle: function(cellInfo) {
> return (cel
dperez schrieb:
> Of course!
>
>
> Fabian Jakobs-2 wrote:
>
>> Are you using a fresh revision?
>>
>>
>
>
That is strange. Are you using custom cell renderer in any of the rows?
If that is the case could you send them to me (private if you like) so I
can see and document what has to be
That's true. You have guessed!
This is my simple custom renderer:
qx.Class.define('CeldaBooleanaClicable', {
extend: qx.ui.table.cellrenderer.Boolean,
members: {
_getCellStyle: function(cellInfo) {
return (cellInfo.style || '') + '
Of course!
Fabian Jakobs-2 wrote:
>
> Are you using a fresh revision?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qooxdoo-0.7.2-planned-for-tomorrow-tf4474652.html#a12774638
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
dperez schrieb:
> I've written too quickly.
> That bug is solved, but another one rises. :-(
> I have a tree with a checkbox column.
> The checkboxes appear on the 1st column of the metacolumn, instead of the
> column where it belongs to, overlapping the contents of the 1st column.
>
> Here is a sc
I've written too quickly.
That bug is solved, but another one rises. :-(
I have a tree with a checkbox column.
The checkboxes appear on the 1st column of the metacolumn, instead of the
column where it belongs to, overlapping the contents of the 1st column.
Here is a screenshot:
http://www.nabble.
Good job Fabian,
I confirm that it' solved. :clap:
Fabian Jakobs-2 wrote:
>
> my recent table changes haven broken tree virtual. I think I have now
> fixed everything again.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qooxdoo-0.7.2-planned-for-tomorrow-tf4474652.html#a1277393
The TreeVirtual is the most powerful tree supplied in qooxdoo and I use it
for nearly everything.
It has worked quite well since the beginnings.
Sebastian Werner wrote:
>
> However I don't think this is release critical. Also because the tree
> virtual was never presented as a stable part (at
Derrell Lipman schrieb:
> On 9/18/07, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What do you think, should we promote the tree virtual as stable for the
>> upcoming 0.7.2 release? I think some qooxdoo users are already using it
>> with success.
>>
>
> No, please don't promote it yet. I'
s the whole purpose of the supportsDrop mechanism
>> since setting it up on the TreeVirtual does nothing because the
>> HorizontalBoxLayout is checked, not the TreeVirtual.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> Di 18 Sep 2007 14:09:46 UTC von Sebas
On 9/18/07, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think, should we promote the tree virtual as stable for the
> upcoming 0.7.2 release? I think some qooxdoo users are already using it
> with success.
No, please don't promote it yet. I'd like to review it first, and I
won't have t
Derrell Lipman schrieb:
> On 9/18/07, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks Christian.
>>
>> May be you can open a bug report for this (if not happended yet). Please
>> be sure to post all the details there.
>>
>> However I don't think this is release critical. Also because
dperez schrieb:
> I consider a critical bug the problem with vertical aligment of TreeVirtual,
> commented today by me in another thread.
>
>
>
Hi David,
my recent table changes haven broken tree virtual. I think I have now
fixed everything again.
Best Fabian
> Sebastian Werner wrote:
>
>>
On 9/18/07, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks Christian.
>
> May be you can open a bug report for this (if not happended yet). Please
> be sure to post all the details there.
>
> However I don't think this is release critical. Also because the tree
> virtual was never present
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 17:25 +0200, Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thank you for your feedback. However it looks quite good in my opinion
> the the current version of the class. This is within the first lines of
> the method "styleFromTheme" which effectively work, even when the debug
>
Hi Paul,
thank you for your feedback. However it looks quite good in my opinion
the the current version of the class. This is within the first lines of
the method "styleFromTheme" which effectively work, even when the debug
mode is off.
if (!entry)
{
if (qx.core.Variant.
Sebastian:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:09 +0200, Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Just want to let you know about our wish to release a small bugfix /
> feature enhancement release of qooxdoo 0.7.x tomorrow. If you have
> comments or crititcal bugs which still needs to get fixed for this
> r
defeats the whole purpose of the supportsDrop mechanism
> since setting it up on the TreeVirtual does nothing because the
> HorizontalBoxLayout is checked, not the TreeVirtual.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christian
>
> Di 18 Sep 2007 14:09:46 UTC von Sebastian Werner an qooxdoo
I consider a critical bug the problem with vertical aligment of TreeVirtual,
commented today by me in another thread.
Sebastian Werner wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Just want to let you know about our wish to release a small bugfix /
> feature enhancement release of qooxdoo 0.7.x tomorrow. If you ha
Hi Sebastian, good to hear! As far as I am concerned, I am still struggling with the fact that during a drag session over a TreeVirtual, the supportsDrop method receives a reference to a HorizontalBoxLayout and not the TreeVirtual itself if the drag source and the drop target are the same ("drop
Hi all!
Just want to let you know about our wish to release a small bugfix /
feature enhancement release of qooxdoo 0.7.x tomorrow. If you have
comments or crititcal bugs which still needs to get fixed for this
release please feel free to send us a reminder. Thank you for your support.
Cheers,
22 matches
Mail list logo
