Hi,
I have a table with say 5 columns. I'd like to have a different background
color in one of these columns (e.g. column 3).
As far as I could figure out the background color is set in the RowRenderer,
but for the whole row. So the next obvious choice would be the CellRenderer.
However, it is no
Hello,
i try to open a little window and the rest of teh app be blocked.
thats runs good but when i select a mennuentry from a main
headlinemenu the open menu will not be closed when i block the page and
open a window. i must always click the mouse again to hide the open menu
--
Hi Fritz,
I had the same case in the end of 2008 and solved it by writing my own
cellrenderer.
I then copied several parts of cellrenderer.Conditional, because I had
to change the behaviour for my needs anyway , and set
style["background-color"] = this.conditions[i][1];
on occasion. I
Hi,
could you please provide a short code snippet which shows your issue?
Thanks,
Chris
Am 04.02.2010 12:33, schrieb smisonl...@googlemail.com:
> Hello,
>
>i try to open a little window and the rest of teh app be blocked.
> thats runs good but when i select a mennuentry from a main
> h
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 03:58, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a table with say 5 columns. I'd like to have a different background
> color in one of these columns (e.g. column 3).
>
> As far as I could figure out the background color is set in the
> RowRenderer,
> but for the whole row. So th
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 03:58, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a table with say 5 columns. I'd like to have a different background
>> color in one of these columns (e.g. column 3).
>>
>> As far as I could figure out the background color is set
Bad news.
Because of Firebug I work only with Firefox.
Yesterday I looked my work in other browsers like Safari (osx), Stainless
(osx), Chrome (osx), IE6 (winxp), ie8 (winxp), firefox (winxp).
Unfortunatelly I found out that the mentioned flush-trick only valid for
firefox (under osx and windows t
Hi Stefan,
I am interested to this post too, because I am playing arround with nearly
same condition.
I know, for me as a beginner this is not the correct way to learn Qooxdoo
:-)
If I read the Apiviewer :
addNumericCondition(String condition, Integer value1, String align, String
color, String s
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your suggestion. Possibly Derrell's playground example might be
useful for your use case as well.
The good news is that cellRenderer style seems to win over rowRenderer style
(which makes sense, I think).
Cheers,
Fritz
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Stefan Volbers wrote:
> Hi Fritz,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 09:41, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
>
> The good news is that cellRenderer style seems to win over rowRenderer
> style
> (which makes sense, I think).
>
If you think about how it might be implemented (and it really is implemented
this way! :-) ), each row is a and each cell withi
Hi danovics,
I tried your example in chrome, even modified it to show() the
secondLayer after secondLayer.setBackgroundColor("blue"); in an event
listener which gets fired after secondLayer disappears.
No chance to have the red square disappear.
In chrome, I don't get an error on
qx.ui.core.qu
Hi,
I am building a application with a tabview widget. When I close a page
the object stays in memory. I've build a little application to show my
point in the playground: http://bit.ly/cR5tW4.
I don't know if this is a bug. Is there anyway to dispose it myself?
Because I already tried by liste
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 09:41, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
>
>>
>> The good news is that cellRenderer style seems to win over rowRenderer
>> style (which makes sense, I think).
>
>
> If you think about how it might be implemented (and it really is
> implemented
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:22, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
> As follow up question: my table uses a DynamicCellRenderer with a
> cellRendererFactory supplying the actual cellRenderer. So the column in
> question actually uses different cellRenderers in different rows. In this
> case I can/must implement
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:22, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
>
>> As follow up question: my table uses a DynamicCellRenderer with a
>> cellRendererFactory supplying the actual cellRenderer. So the column in
>> question actually uses different cellRenderers in dif
Hi,
I currently make some experimentation using the htmlarea component and I was
wondering why the elements inside the selection must be inside a paragraph
before executing a command.
For instance, in the example of the demo page
(http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/demobrowser/#bom~HtmlArea.html), i
Hi Martijen,
a automatically dispose is in my opinion not correct, because perhaps
you will reuse the closed page. If the dispose it automatically you
can't reuse it.
To dispose the closed page, you can add a listener to the "close" event
and call the destroy method on the page. Here my exampl
Hi martijn,
if you change your code like this:
button1.addListener("execute", function(e) {
var p = new qx.ui.tabview.Page("Test: " + count++);
p.setShowCloseButton(true);
tv.add(p);
p.addListener("close", function(){
p.destroy();
label.setValue(qx.dev.ObjectSummary.getInfo().s
Hi Benoît,
On Thursday February 4 2010 16:33:58 benco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently make some experimentation using the htmlarea component and I
> was wondering why the elements inside the selection must be inside a
> paragraph before executing a command.
>
> For instance, in the example of the
Hi,
it seems to me that the flush is done by qooxdoo, but the browser
doesn't render the result done with the flush.
I tried your example with a timer and it seems to me that this is the trick:
button.addListener("execute", function(e) {
// first hide the red colored secondLayer
FYI [2] didn't work for me w/Chrome 4.0 under Windows XP. The log window shows
"Unforunately, an unrecoverable internal error was caused by your code." after
"Successfully started.".
[1] does work and is very cool.
-Bruce
> -Original Message-
> From: MartinWittemann [mailto:martin.w
I've been using the free Microsoft debugger called Visual Web Developer 2008
for a while now. It's great: when something bad happens you get a nice stack
to look at and an immediate window where you can evaluate expressions. In
other words, a real debugger, even in IE.
However, since I upgraded t
Hello,
i try in a class to access the root
this.getApplicationRoot().unblock();
but that dosent run. How can i access the root?
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with
this.getRoot() ?
Cheers,
Fritz
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, smisonl...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i try in a class to access the root
>
> this.getApplicationRoot().unblock();
>
> but that dosent run. How can i access the root?
>
>
Hello,
no , , i try this
getStartLoginbox : function ()
{
var req = new
qx.io.remote.Request(job.system.Globals.processorURL, "POST",
"application/json");
req.setRequestHeader("Content-Type",
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
> Hello,
> no , , i try this
>
> getStartLoginbox : function ()
> {
> var req = new
> qx.io.remote.Request(job.system.Globals.processorURL, "POST",
> "application/json");
> req.setRequestHeader("Content-Type",
> "application/x-www-form-url
Hello,
no, i try
this.getApplication().getRoot()
this.getRoot()
this.getApplicationRoot();
nothing is working
>> Hello,
>> no , , i try this
>>
>> getStartLoginbox : function ()
>> {
>> var req = new
>> qx.io.remote.Request(job.system.Globals.pro
Do you get an error message in the console window? I suspect that "this"
might not be set.
Cheers,
Fritz
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, smisonl...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> no, i try
>
> this.getApplication().getRoot()
> this.getRoot()
> this.getApplicationRoot();
>
> nothing is working
>
>>> He
Hello,
no, no error. i try in a sub method to add a win and then set
subwin.getApplicationRoot() and that runs fine.
> Do you get an error message in the console window? I suspect that "this"
> might not be set.
>
> Cheers,
> Fritz
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, smisonl...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your feedback. The behavior you describe should already be fixed
and will go online today for testing. So just check out the devel version
after the update and it should work. :)
Regards,
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Playground-custom-examples
30 matches
Mail list logo
