I have done all the steps to gain access to the TCK, which is how I
know we are 100% compliant. But what I'd like to know is, is there a
formal procedure we go through with Sun to become recognised as JMS
Compliant?
On 22/06/07, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did u follow up with
This method is only used from the performance test suite as a
convenience for creating a queue. We have never made attempts to
expose the underlying AMQP as an API. If we were to do such a thing
then a lang.String would of course be the natural choice. Currently
all Strings in the client API that
Also, perf test suite should really have been coded to the JMS api only.
Something I intend to change eventually...
On 22/06/07, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This method is only used from the performance test suite as a
convenience for creating a queue. We have never made attempts
As an aside, I would argue that for a low level API, AMQShortString
would be the correct type for the argument to a declareQueue method,
as the valid set of names for a queue is not (java.lang.)String but
only (a subset of) those that can be represented by AMQShortString.
(Obviously higher level
Martin,
My understand is that if we pass the tests we can make the statement. If
we get challenged by SUN
we need to be able to show that we pass.
Carl.
Martin Ritchie wrote:
I have done all the steps to gain access to the TCK, which is how I
know we are 100% compliant. But what I'd like
On Friday 22 June 2007 09:28, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Martin,
My understand is that if we pass the tests we can make the statement.
If we get challenged by SUN
we need to be able to show that we pass.
No. You also need to file a statement with Sun first and have them
acknowledge it before
Dan,
where do you get the forms, we had mailed Geir but had no response. I
expect he might
be busy. Are they publically on the SUN site somewhere?
Carl.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2007 09:28, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Martin,
My understand is that if we pass the tests we can
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 16:14 +0100, Martin Ritchie wrote:
Having resolved the issues with the java merges to trunk there are
still six outstanding merges.
2 for C++
4 for C#
While I could just merge these changes it would be good if the people
that made the changes (highlighted below)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507460
]
Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-498:
--
I finally got around to looking at this patch and I have a few
