Re: [VOTE][ANN] M2 Release

2007-11-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
You can close the vote here without the 3 mentor votes providing enough of your PPMC votes are there. Then call the vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Between the two votes, you need to have the three binding votes. However, even if you get three votes here, you still have to call the vote on [

Re: [VOTE][ANN] M2 Release

2007-11-07 Thread Rajith Attapattu
The vote has been running for 72 hours and so far we have got only one mentor vote. Can the remaning mentors vote, so we can close the vote and finalize the release. Regards, Rajith On Nov 6, 2007 8:06 AM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > -- Rajith Attapattu Red Hat Blog http

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-639) we still need to include sizes for sized structs

2007-11-07 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-639. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in r592895 > we still need to include sizes for sized structs > --

Re: QPid examples - C++, Python, Java

2007-11-07 Thread Jonathan Robie
Rupert Smith wrote: Jonathan, Just in case you did not realize it, but there are already some Java examples under client/examples. OK, I won't focus on Java examples. Jonathan

Re: Weekly plans.

2007-11-07 Thread Carl Trieloff
The number I gave was a single publisher, 1-4 consumers (but consume rate is not symmetric which is a problem) Thanks for the config info of tests on M2. Carl. Rupert Smith wrote: What size of messages are you maxing the 1Gig connection at? Obviously its easy to do with big messages. I will

Re: Weekly plans.

2007-11-07 Thread Rupert Smith
What size of messages are you maxing the 1Gig connection at? Obviously its easy to do with big messages. I will attempt to guess, assuming the test is pubsub 1:x, with x large enough that I can assume the broadcast traffic is what is consuming the bandwidth. 1Gbit/sec / 8 bits/byte / 176k msgs/sec

Re: Weekly plans.

2007-11-07 Thread Carl Trieloff
Robert Greig wrote: On 07/11/2007, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This week I will be adding dtx and crash recovery tests, I will also be looking at optimizing the java 0_10 client. Do you have any performance test results for the 0-10 client? RG As all the clients are

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-640) The C++ struct encode/decode always includes nested structs even when they're empty, and (I believe) transforms empty strings to null

2007-11-07 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-640. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in r592753 > The C++ struct encode/decode always includes nested structs even when

Re: Weekly plans.

2007-11-07 Thread Robert Greig
On 07/11/2007, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This week I will be adding dtx and crash recovery tests, I will also be > looking at optimizing the java 0_10 client. Do you have any performance test results for the 0-10 client? RG

[jira] Updated: (QPID-678) Test library does not allow broker to add headers

2007-11-07 Thread Martin Ritchie (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Ritchie updated QPID-678: Attachment: QPID-678-PythonTestLib.patch I'll commit this on M2.1 but if a python guru could also rev

[jira] Created: (QPID-678) Test library does not allow broker to add headers

2007-11-07 Thread Martin Ritchie (JIRA)
Test library does not allow broker to add headers - Key: QPID-678 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-678 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: Python Client Affec

Weekly plans.

2007-11-07 Thread Arnaud Simon
This week I will be adding dtx and crash recovery tests, I will also be looking at optimizing the java 0_10 client.

Re: QPid examples - C++, Python, Java

2007-11-07 Thread Rupert Smith
Jonathan, Just in case you did not realize it, but there are already some Java examples under client/examples. Rupert On 06/11/2007, Jonathan Robie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > Here is the current version of the examples I've been working on. Please > look them over and check them