Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Daniel Kulp wrote: Steve, I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in the next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue with the M2 release. As long as they will be releasing at some point, going ahead at this stage with snapshots is not necessarily a bad thing. I would however say that we should try to not be on a snapshot for a 1.0 or production release. As with milestone releases it is better to be using the code we need and to be able to provide feedback and bug fixes back to earlier I would thus say, go to a version with the stuff we need, and let's get it tested now, and from my side I have no issue if M2 also releases with a snapshot ( we have the process understood for it ). I would rather have snapshots now than when we do a 1.0 release for example. Carl.
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
The MINA team are hoping to build a release bu Wed next week fyi. (I've been following the MINA dev list) Marnie On 11/23/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I fully agree. On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Steve, > > I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's > unless the > Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in > the > next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot > issue > with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes > the > bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues > when > there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non- > snapshot > version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven > repositories) > > Dan > > > > On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote: >> I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not >> actually cut yet.. no response >> >> Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us >> using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision >> 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure >> what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the >> code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a >> single >> bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code >> would be available but it state where the source came from and what >> reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm >> new >> to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the >> software than to let people actually use it. :D >> >> On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to >>> convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on >>> the snapshot maven repository? >>> >>> --steve >>> >>> On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? page=comments#action_12452295 ] Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release to use. > Implement Mina API changes > -- > > Key: QPID-92 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 > Project: Qpid > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Java Broker, Java Client >Affects Versions: M1 >Reporter: Martin Ritchie > Assigned To: Martin Ritchie > Fix For: M2 > > > See: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer > IONA > P: 781-902-8727C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
I fully agree. On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: Steve, I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in the next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes the bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues when there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non- snapshot version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven repositories) Dan On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote: I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not actually cut yet.. no response Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a single bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code would be available but it state where the source came from and what reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm new to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the software than to let people actually use it. :D On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on the snapshot maven repository? --steve On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? page=comments#action_12452295 ] Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release to use. Implement Mina API changes -- Key: QPID-92 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: Java Broker, Java Client Affects Versions: M1 Reporter: Martin Ritchie Assigned To: Martin Ritchie Fix For: M2 See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Steve, I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in the next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes the bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues when there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non-snapshot version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven repositories) Dan On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote: > I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not > actually cut yet.. no response > > Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us > using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision > 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure > what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the > code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a single > bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code > would be available but it state where the source came from and what > reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm new > to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the > software than to let people actually use it. :D > > On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to > > convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on > > the snapshot maven repository? > > > > --steve > > > > On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: > > > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? > > > page=comments#action_12452295 ] > > > > > > Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: > > > > > > > > > Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a > > > local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release > > > to use. > > > > > >> Implement Mina API changes > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Key: QPID-92 > > >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 > > >> Project: Qpid > > >> Issue Type: Bug > > >> Components: Java Broker, Java Client > > >>Affects Versions: M1 > > >>Reporter: Martin Ritchie > > >> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie > > >> Fix For: M2 > > >> > > >> > > >> See: > > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > > - > > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the > > > administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ > > > Administrators.jspa > > > - > > > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ > > > software/jira -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not actually cut yet.. no response Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a single bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code would be available but it state where the source came from and what reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm new to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the software than to let people actually use it. :D On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on the snapshot maven repository? --steve On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? > page=comments#action_12452295 ] > > Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: > > > Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a > local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release > to use. > >> Implement Mina API changes >> -- >> >> Key: QPID-92 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 >> Project: Qpid >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Java Broker, Java Client >>Affects Versions: M1 >>Reporter: Martin Ritchie >> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie >> Fix For: M2 >> >> >> See: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the > administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ > Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ > software/jira > > -- Martin Ritchie
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on the snapshot maven repository? --steve On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92? page=comments#action_12452295 ] Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92: Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release to use. Implement Mina API changes -- Key: QPID-92 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: Java Broker, Java Client Affects Versions: M1 Reporter: Martin Ritchie Assigned To: Martin Ritchie Fix For: M2 See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira
