log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread Vincent Colet
one question ...     I use qpopper and I want to check the volume of mail data fetched by some users by POP3   ok with the statistics option activated et we can check syslog/log file (f.e. /var/log/mail) and search some records like       Feb 17 00:00:49 mail popper[29402]: Stats: randy 0 0

problem w/ Solaris 8, PAM, and qpoppper 4.0.3

2001-06-21 Thread Michael Puskar
I have tried getting qpopper to work with PAM on a Solaris 8 box. I configured with ./configure --with-pam=pop3 and the compile goes fine. I make install. I edit /etc/pam.conf. I edit inetd.conf to allow pop3 and restart inetd. The pam.conf is : pop3auth required /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pam

Re: log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread WSO Support
I have the EXACT same question, thanks for posting it. -Chris WSO At 05:15 PM 6/21/2001 -0700, you wrote: >one question ... > > >I use qpopper and I want to check the volume of mail data fetched by some users by >POP3 > >ok with the statistics option activated et we can check syslog/log fi

Re: log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
enable the debug/trace #defines in pop_send.c? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as

Fw: log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread Vincent Colet
> > enable the debug/trace #defines in pop_send.c? > I don't know ... because it's not me that have installed the qpopper on the local hardware ... but I know that is an very old version (2.5) urrghh ! ...so ok, I will reinstall the last version with correct flag in configure file ... and my q

Re: Fw: log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread Jesus Cea Avion
> and my question can be reformulated in "why the statistics after each > session (enabled with option -t) don't still integrate one additionnal > field (after the 4 others numbers), that give the amount of fetched > data (header + body) ?" I've done trivial patch against current sources:

Qpopper+Kerberos in Solaris 8 for Intel

2001-06-21 Thread Luis F V Gomes
I am having linking problems compiling qpopper 4.0.2 in a Solaris 8 Intel machine. I downloaded MIT's Kerberos 5 vs 1.2.2 but when I do make after ./configure --enable-servermode --enable-apop --enable-popuid=root --with-kerberos5=/usr/local/krb5-1.2.2/src I got the following error message

Re: Qpopper+Kerberos in Solaris 8 for Intel

2001-06-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:56:27 -0300, Luis F V Gomes wrote: >Undefined first referenced > symbol in file >krb_mk_priv /usr/local/krb5-1.2.2/src/lib/libkrb5 >util.a(compat_recv.o) >krb5_c_encrypt_length /usr/local/krb5-1.2.2/src/lib/libkrb5 >.a(enc_

Re: problem w/ Solaris 8, PAM, and qpoppper 4.0.3

2001-06-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:52:45 -0400 (EDT), Michael Puskar wrote: >I have tried getting qpopper to work with PAM on a Solaris 8 box. I >configured with ./configure --with-pam=pop3 and the compile goes fine. I >make install. I edit /etc/pam.conf. I edit inetd.conf to allow pop3 and >restart inetd. >

Re: problem w/ Solaris 8, PAM, and qpoppper 4.0.3

2001-06-21 Thread Michael Puskar
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:52:45 -0400 (EDT), Michael Puskar wrote: > > >I have tried getting qpopper to work with PAM on a Solaris 8 box. I > >configured with ./configure --with-pam=pop3 and the compile goes fine. I > >make install. I edit /etc/pam.conf.

Re: problem w/ Solaris 8, PAM, and qpoppper 4.0.3

2001-06-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:37:39 -0400 (EDT), Michael Puskar wrote: >Jun 21 16:20:37.811 2001 [20499] pam_authenticate returned 9; gp_errcode=0 >[pop_pass.c:473] > >So the problem seems to be somewhere in PAM. I have been looking for what >the error number 9 means, but with no luck. Looking at PAM h

Re: Fw: log file and volume of data ...

2001-06-21 Thread WSO Support
Jesus, Thanks for the code. So, your patch just adds an extra field to the stats line that shows how much total data was retrieved in that session? Just looking for clarification. Thanks! -Chris WSO At 08:45 PM 6/21/2001 +0200, you wrote: >> and my question can be reformulated in "why the sta