Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-08 Thread Andre Somers
Op 7-10-2011 10:47, Petr Vanek schreef: On Oct 7, 2011 (Friday), at 10:26 AM, Yves Bailly wrote: Hello all, Le 07/10/2011 09:49, Olivier Goffart a écrit : On Friday 07 October 2011 15:14:33 Daniel Mendizabal wrote: [...] The question is if it this is a good thing to spend time on QWidget.

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-08 Thread Daniel Mendizabal
Note that you can keep your Qt backend intact and plug it to a QML UI with relative ease. This is probably a good idea for mobile apps based on Qt 4 already. I have been reading about using C++ with QML UI, but I don't find it straight forward at all. And the reason is simple, Qt project is

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 00:00:08 Daniel Mendizabal wrote: - Applications oriented to productivity, utilities, etc. with the only requirement to have the feel and look from the underlying OS and theme will also possibly need more complex routines and the classical approach (QWidget/C++)

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-08 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:11:38 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: What data do you have to base your conclusion that QWidget / C++ is more suitable? I can follow the argumentation for using the scene graph instead of QWidget because of technical limitations. But introducing QML instead of C ++ is a