Re: [Qt5-feedback] Command line parser in QtCore?
The question is never why not have something in core, it's why does this need to be in core. Being small in size is not a very good reason... On 21/10/2011 20:12 Иван Комиссаров wrote: CMD line parser is very small utility, not more than 500-1000 lines of code (even with feature of type-checking), so why not to include it into Core? As far as i remember, kde implementation doesn't have some features (i compared some tools when i need some parser; boost parser was best option for me; however it has awful syntax and doesn't integrate with Qt types and QVariant, so i had to reinvent wheel:( ) 21.10.2011, в 21:03, Andre Somers написал(а): Op 21-10-2011 16:29, Stefan Majewsky schreef: Moin moin, it would be nice to have a command line parser in QtCore, i.e. some class that parses stuff like ./program -vh --long-option --value=5 foo.dat given some format definition. KCmdLineArgs and KCmdLineOptions from kdecore do exactly that for KDE programs. I don't have time right now, but perhaps someone wants to pick up this task? Does it need to be in core? Would an add-on module that only depends on QtCore not be just as useful? André ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes
Be realist, people that get paid to work on Qt mostly get paid with the expectation that Qt will deliver on mobile. Expecting anyone to not care about mobile use cases is not going to fly here. On 10/10/11 8:27 PM Иван Комиссаров wrote: Qt is _not_ used for mobile development as i see. In fact, i agree that QWidgets are bad there. But main use-case for qt framework is desktop. Lot of arguments was about limitations of qwidgets and one of the example was mac style. First produce next billion devices (that would be sold), than let us your managers use nokia phones (Green still uses IPhone?), that we talk about mobile development. Not to be rude, i just don't share your optimism about mobile development with Qt. Development of new technologies is great, but do not break main and only place Qt works on - desktop platforms. 10.10.2011, в 21:12, Quim Gil написал(а): On 10/10/2011 09:58 AM, ext Иван Комиссаров wrote: Most of letters from nokia developers that says that QML is great technology mention mobile platforms. Just in case you missed it, the opener of this thread expressed his concerns on QWidget vs QML in mobile platforms - and this is the topic of this thread: On 10/06/2011 10:14 PM, ext Daniel Mendizabal wrote: But what happen now when new mobile phones come with Qt5 without QWidget support? -- Quim ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback ___ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
