Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread the pickle
At 21:47 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: Oh common? Enough said! I like you, but I can't resist pointing out that you complained about a common (almost acceptable) misspelling of dammit and then immediately misspelling come on ... ;) -- the pickle FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml Software

Re: NuBus Mac for audio

2002-12-18 Thread the pickle
At 00:03 -0500 on 18/12/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I have a Pro Audio Spectrum 16 card that I will be using to record audio to a hard drive or RAM disk. I have some questions about using a computer for this purpose. Would it be more important to have a faster processor speed or

Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread the pickle
At 22:08 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: None were meant to be an attack. I get just as frustrated as you do about I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that you can't even take two seconds to figure out

Re: Apple Mac computers?

2002-12-18 Thread Frederick Silliman
http://www.apple.com/ Terry Ovans wrote: Can anyone tell me where to find some information on older Apple and Macintosh computers. I have 8 of them and would like to know what makes them tick, how to fix them, other technical stuff like that. Want a new laptop for $25. Check out

Re: Apple Mac computers?

2002-12-18 Thread E McCann
At 03:57 PM 12/18/2002, Terry Ovans typed thusly: Can anyone tell me where to find some information on older Apple and Macintosh computers. I have 8 of them and would like to know what makes them tick, how to fix them, other technical stuff like that. Basic info? Why not head to

Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread suignrs
I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that you can't even take two seconds to figure out *WHY* you might be getting these messages and doing something about them, I'm sorry, but I'd rather not have you around,

WARNING !!!!!!! was Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread vincenzo
Greetings to all I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that you can't even take two seconds to figure out *WHY* you might be getting these messages and doing something about them, I'm sorry, but I'd rather

Re: WARNING !!!!!!! was Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread suignrs
Enough is enough. I have tried dealing with this on the quiet and it didn't work. So here goes, Anyone blasting or flaming (which ever terminology you wish to use) another member on list will have their posting priviledges immeditely suspended, till further notice. It sure doesn't take much

Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread suignrs
Try to understand the Ref has said enough is enough! There was no particular person mentioned, just that the BS has to stop! The nanny didn't ask who started it, but just wants this type of inconsiderate behavior ended. Is that too much to ask for? John Getting a little holier than thou

Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread suignrs
No not holier than thou, read the rest of the message of how I didn't care for the taking of God's name in vain and how I thought it was very off color. Of course, and since this one is coming directly to you and not the list, you don't seem to understand about trying to find peace. First you

Q950 upgrade was Re: NO MORE WARNING! Messages

2002-12-18 Thread Ian Moffatt
On 19/12/02 6:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No you don't you smug, smarmy, fundimentalist hypocrite. You want me to drop dead, but if you admitted to yourself that you felt that way then you'd realze what an evil self-centered hypocritical SOB you really are. No he