Greetings, Paul! On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 7:20:14 PM UTC+3, Paul Reid wrote: > > And it won't support a VM like QuadStor, nor would it like a VM that has > an HBA passed through to it, like the QuadStor VM does. > I'm not agree, because the successfull example already exists. Nutanix has the storage, running in a VM, and it has the SRM agent. The HBA passthrough is not mandatory, commonly saying, and QuadStor on FreeBSD perfectly runs in VM (I played a lot with this tandem). Thus, technologically, QuadStor is near to be a building block for hyperconvergent system, but now it may miss some particular features for particular applications (like SRM agent).
On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 7:20:14 PM UTC+3, Paul Reid wrote: > I have a backup solution in place, called Altaro VMBackup.... In fact, if > I am in a rush, I can spin up critical VMs directly from the NAS while I > get the QuadStor vdisks set up again for a proper restore. > In my sandbox the Veem is much popular, but the multi-layer availability solution (storage mirroring + offsite backup) makes the great respect from my side. Well done! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QUADStor Storage Virtualization" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quadstor-virt+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
