On October 6, 2016 11:47:59 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
One outstanding issue for the release is operation of BGP without
zebra. (The NHT change basically introduces a requirement to run BGP
with zebra, while there are route server/reflector
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
One outstanding issue for the release is operation of BGP without
zebra. (The NHT change basically introduces a requirement to run BGP
with zebra, while there are route server/reflector configs which are
viable now running only BGP.)
I suggest changing
Le 06/10/2016 à 17:01, Philippe Guibert a écrit :
No. Please merge to master ASAP.
>
+1
+1
___
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
---
quagga/bgpd/bgp_nht.c | 3 ++-
quagga/bgpd/bgp_zebra.c | 11 +++
quagga/bgpd/bgp_zebra.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/quagga/bgpd/bgp_nht.c b/quagga/bgpd/bgp_nht.c
index 591fbf9..c4acb66 100644
--- a/quagga/bgpd/bgp_nht.c
+++
I think something to address before a release, but not sure if we should
hold off merging to master because of it.
Lou, are you proposing to fix this before merging to master?
- Martin
On 6 Oct 2016, at 6:30, Lou Berger wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On October 6, 2016 6:05:14 AM Paul Jakma
Paul,
On October 6, 2016 6:05:14 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
...
>
> One change from the last release in BGP is ANVL-BGPPLUS-17.1 related to
> address used for nexthop - NHT related? Is it serious?
>
> Looks acceptable generally.
>
One outstanding issue for the release is operation of
There are a few OSPFv3 issues as well
ANVL-OSPFV3-8.5 & 19.11-19.16
I have not looked yet into the failure case (sorry busy this week).
I would vote to address them after the merge to master.
- Martin
On 6 Oct 2016, at 3:02, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
Paul,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
Paul,
Results are updated.
See
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8W_T0dxQfwxZFdJd1lPOXo3bHM?usp=sharing
OSPFv2 issues are fixed.
I haven’t looked at all the other protocols, but overall they seem to be
mostly
ok.
Yeah, mostly unchanged.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
OSPFv2 issues are fixed. I haven’t looked at all the other protocols,
but overall they seem to be mostly ok.
\o/
Let me know if there are any concerns regarding a specific issue and
I’ll look into it, but might both have much time this week anymore
Continous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL
Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests
Tested-by: NetDEF CI System
This is an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback, feel free to email
Martin Winter .
Patches applied :
From: David Lamparter
Support for multiple label support handling in NLRI messages.
Ability to receive and sent BGP updates with NLRI containing multiple
labels. The commit follows label encoding rules, contained in RFC3107.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter
From: David Lamparter
API enhancement to be able to write and read 3 byte series in
stream structures.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert
---
lib/stream.c | 77
bgp NLRI has a specific format for label, terminating with bottom
of stack bit. This value is updated in all BGP attribute tests. A
specific test has been added to check for a list of labels contained
in a single NLRI.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert
---
Paul,
Results are updated.
See
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8W_T0dxQfwxZFdJd1lPOXo3bHM?usp=sharing
OSPFv2 issues are fixed.
I haven’t looked at all the other protocols, but overall they seem to
be mostly
ok.
Let me know if there are any concerns regarding a specific issue and
14 matches
Mail list logo