[Separating threads - here] Paul,
On 6/28/2016 9:02 AM, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote: > .... >> That's what has driven us to here. I simply can not fail to mention >> the facts of this, because this is the _prime point of disagreement_ >> between us. > And I tried just to gently pushback on the majority voting stuff > initially, however to no avail. The more that wasn't heard, the more > explicit I had to get on why this bothers me particularly in this > context. In the current proposal/discussion, disputes are resolved based on majority voting of *maintainers*. While there has been some discussion on simple (>1/2) vs super (2/3s) majority, I haven't heard anyone else support the position of any holding veto power. Do you really think that majority voting of *maintainers* is unreasonable? Lou > Sorry. But hey. > > regards, _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
