[quagga-dev 14951] Re: Fwd: [PATCH 2/2] bgpd: Addition of bgp dampening configuration commands under IPv4 Multicast address family mode.

Hi Donald, Thanks for the information. - Balaji On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Donald Sharp wrote: > Balaji - > > I'm currently working towards getting in the take-3 branch. Once that is > done the next maintainer will work towards the other backlog > > Donald

[quagga-dev 14950] Re: Fwd: [PATCH 2/2] bgpd: Addition of bgp dampening configuration commands under IPv4 Multicast address family mode.

Balaji - I'm currently working towards getting in the take-3 branch. Once that is done the next maintainer will work towards the other backlog Donald On Mar 19, 2016 10:38 AM, "Balaji Gurudoss" wrote: > Hi > > I think these patches didn't get applied. Can you apply it if

[quagga-dev 14945] Re: A question on project roles (was Re: Monthly Quagga Meeting)

Hi Donald, I made the distinction as contribution of code has possible copyright implications (and may add copyright holders to Quagga) while reviewers never have this consideration. Does this make sense? Lou On 3/15/2016 11:04 AM, Donald Sharp wrote: > In general I like this proposal. I

[quagga-dev 14949] Fwd: [PATCH 2/2] bgpd: Addition of bgp dampening configuration commands under IPv4 Multicast address family mode.

Hi I think these patches didn't get applied. Can you apply it if its fine with you. http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1792/ http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1791/ Thanks, - Balaji -- Forwarded message -- From: Balaji Gurudoss Date: Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at

[quagga-dev 14947] Re: [PATCH 00/89] Cumulus Take-3 Electric Bugaloooooooooooooooo

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Don Slice wrote: Since both of these are informational rather than standards track, is it a safe bet to operate as these two describe when there are potential known bad side-effects? The Deployment considerations section of RFC6987 states that inconsistent results could