Le 27/05/2015 03:26, Xiaorong (Andrew) Qu a écrit :
Hi Jafar,
Either way of merging should work.
As for terminology, using your example" VRF 3 table 2" is not ideal to me.
I would like "netns 3|blue table 2" as netns is the
keyword for namespace anyway.
That is right, what I am working on is to support
netns [3|blue] table 2
netns [3|blue] table 3
netns [2|red] table 1
In my mind, VRF is for any table within each NS (namespace).
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I would say that quagga can run on
OS != linux and netns is a linux construction.
With our series, it's possible to implement another OS layer to use the 'VRF'
feature: there is a split between the OS (linux only in our series) layer
(which uses netns) and the core code.
Regards,
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
