On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:12:13AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > I wasn't aware of the NIST Randomness Beacon. Very interesting. Thanks
> > > for bringing it to my attention. As far as I can tell, this looks like a
> > > very good source for the Proof of Freshness. Would you like
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 7:47:22 PM UTC-4, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
>
>
>
> On 18 March 2018 at 23:12, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
>
> To be honest, I don't think we need more proofs of freshness there. We
>
> already have various news
Hi Marek,
On 18 March 2018 at 23:12, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <
marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
> To be honest, I don't think we need more proofs of freshness there. We
> already have various news headlines (chosen from different countries),
> bitcoin blockchain and now NIST Randomness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 04:00:22PM -0700, Innovative Inventor wrote:
> On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 12:31:13 AM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 2018-03-17 16:34, Innovative Inventor
On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 12:31:13 AM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2018-03-17 16:34, Innovative Inventor wrote:
> > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:19:47 PM UTC-5, Innovative Inventor wrote:
> >> I was looking at the canaries, and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2018-03-17 16:34, Innovative Inventor wrote:
> On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:19:47 PM UTC-5, Innovative Inventor wrote:
>> I was looking at the canaries, and I liked the idea of a proof of freshness
>> with the latest news headlines. While
On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:19:47 PM UTC-5, Innovative Inventor wrote:
> I was looking at the canaries, and I liked the idea of a proof of freshness
> with the latest news headlines. While people can't create canaries ahead of
> time, it is possible to conspire to modify or backdate one of