[qubes-devel] OpenBSD presentation talks about ideas similar to Qubes

2018-03-10 Thread viq
Article on Undeadly [0] mentions Mike Larkin's presentation [1], and pages 26+ talk about ideas for future of OpenBSD's virtualization manager [2], some of which sound a lot like what Qubes is aiming for. [0] https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20180309064801 [1]

Re: [qubes-devel] Timestamp canaries

2018-03-10 Thread Innovative Inventor
On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 1:19:28 PM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:12:08PM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:19:47PM -0800, theinnovativeinven...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > I was looking at the canaries, and I liked the idea of a

Re: [qubes-devel] Timestamp canaries

2018-03-10 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:12:08PM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:19:47PM -0800, theinnovativeinven...@gmail.com > wrote: > > I was looking at the canaries, and I liked the idea of a proof of freshness > > with the latest news headlines. While people can't create canaries

Re: [qubes-devel] Timestamp canaries

2018-03-10 Thread Peter Todd
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Is there any sensible way of installing OTS client securely? There is a > chain of dependencies which are not packaged for neither Debian or > Fedora (python-opentimestamps, bitcoinlib, pysha3, ...). And since pip > rely

Re: [qubes-devel] Timestamp canaries

2018-03-10 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 06:39:50PM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Is there any sensible way of installing OTS client securely? There is a > > chain of dependencies which are not packaged for neither Debian or > > Fedora

Re: [qubes-devel] OpenBSD presentation talks about ideas similar to Qubes

2018-03-10 Thread Jean-Philippe Ouellet
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:48 AM, viq wrote: > Article on Undeadly [0] mentions Mike Larkin's presentation [1], and pages > 26+ talk about ideas for future of OpenBSD's virtualization manager [2], > some of which sound a lot like what Qubes is aiming for. > > [0]