Re: [qubes-devel] Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices?

2024-03-02 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 12:53:21PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Simon Gaiser wrote: > > > Demi Marie Obenour: > > > > Is

Re: [qubes-devel] Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices?

2024-03-02 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Simon Gaiser wrote: > > Demi Marie Obenour: > > > Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices? I’m specifically > > >

Re: [qubes-devel] Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices?

2024-03-02 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Simon Gaiser wrote: > Demi Marie Obenour: > > Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices? I’m specifically > > wondering about a configuration in which the only emulated device is a > > virtio GPU,

Re: [qubes-devel] Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices?

2024-03-02 Thread Simon Gaiser
Demi Marie Obenour: > Is QEMU in dom0 fine if it emulates zero devices? I’m specifically > wondering about a configuration in which the only emulated device is a > virtio GPU, which will be emulated via crosvm’s vhost-user-gpu support. > This might require some QEMU patches to support the extra