On Sunday, March 10, 2019 at 12:47:25 AM UTC, seshu wrote:
> I recently updated dom0, after the xen vulnerabilities were identified, and
> I"m coming across this error when I try to open Qubes Setting for any VM.
>
> TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable at line 9 of file
>
just got a pop up notification
Qube Status: myvm
Domain myvem has failed to start: internal error: libexenlight failed to create
new domain 'myvm'
myvm has existed and started fine for many months. trying it again worked.
is this a known issue? should it be reported? if so, anything besides
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:31:48 -0600
Daniel Allcock wrote:
>Hi Stuart,
>
>Just a guess, but perhaps this is it. I assume you are using
>dnf install in the usual way, not anything exotic.
>
>When you install software in the template, the AppVm doesn't "notice"
>until you restart it.
Mr. DONG:
> Please can someone also send one to me!
>
> Very, very appreciated!!
>
>
> Thank you a million!
>
I don't have any but you might want to look at elude.in (you need Tor
Browser to access the real website). They offer an interesting email
service (for free) which is accessible
So after enabling Virtualization, I get a new error on the sys-net and
sys-firewall that reads:
Domain sys-net has failed to start: internal error: libxenlight failed to
create new domain 'sys-net'
*Regards,*
*Joseph Ragno *
*Marketing Technology Specialist*
*M:* (908) 217-1940
*F: *(954)
I tried booting up with just the APU plugged in and found out that the recent
kernel is also not compatible with the APU providing the graphics. My
sys-firewall and sys-whonix wouldn't start.
I went back to square 1, installing NVIDIA drivers in dom0 with rpm and found
that earlier I was using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
just set up Qubes R4.0.1 on a ThinkPad X1 Yoga (1st Gen) using UEFI boot.
Despite other reports, screen brightness work correctly right away. Touchscreen
did work during installation but stopped working afterwards when I enabled
sys-usb.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/9/19 2:58 AM, unman wrote:
> Why do you say this? It's far from my experience.
>
> If you use a minimal Debian template for firewall, then there are
> only iptables rules. It's trivial in that case to add logging. You
> can also implement
