Re: [qubes-users] Re: [qubes-devel] QSB #49: Microarchitectural Data Sampling speculative side channel (XSA-297)

2019-05-16 Thread 'Ilpo Järvinen' via qubes-users
On Thu, 16 May 2019, g80vmgm...@riseup.net wrote: > From XSA297: > """ > Work is ongoing on xen-devel to develop core-aware scheduling, which > will mitigate the cross-domain leak by ensuring that vcpus from > different domains are never concurrently scheduled on sibling threads. > However, this

Re: [qubes-users] Re: [qubes-devel] QSB #49: Microarchitectural Data Sampling speculative side channel (XSA-297)

2019-05-16 Thread g80vmgmsqw
Ilpo Järvinen: > On Thu, 16 May 2019, g80vmgm...@riseup.net wrote: > >> From XSA297: >> """ >> Work is ongoing on xen-devel to develop core-aware scheduling, which >> will mitigate the cross-domain leak by ensuring that vcpus from >> different domains are never concurrently scheduled on sibling

[qubes-users] Re: [qubes-devel] QSB #49: Microarchitectural Data Sampling speculative side channel (XSA-297)

2019-05-16 Thread g80vmgmsqw
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dear Qubes Community, > > We have just published Qubes Security Bulletin (QSB) #49: Microarchitectural > Data Sampling speculative side channel (XSA-297). > The text of this QSB is reproduced below. > This QSB

[qubes-users] Re: [qubes-devel] QSB #49: Microarchitectural Data Sampling speculative side channel (XSA-297)

2019-05-16 Thread Chris Laprise
On 5/15/19 6:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: Only Intel processors are affected. I think the pattern showing AMD to be more conscientious in their processor designs is now undeniable. Even if its only a matter of degree, the difference appears to be rather substantial. You should