Re: [qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-20 Thread cooloutac
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 1:50:43 PM UTC-5, cooloutac wrote: > Ya I'm not sure I would want the bleeding edge kernel to be replace default > on the iso though. I'd rather be using the most "secure" one. I would even be in favor of replacing fedora 25 with debian stable for "security"

Re: [qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-20 Thread cooloutac
Ya I'm not sure I would want the bleeding edge kernel to be replace default on the iso though. I'd rather be using the most "secure" one. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-20 Thread cooloutac
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 11:41:15 PM UTC-5, Mike Freemon wrote: > On 12/19/2017 01:04 PM, cooloutac wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 10:05:49 AM UTC-5, Vincent Adultman wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> > >> > >> We were chatting today in IRC about current user expectations and > >>

[qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-19 Thread Mike Freemon
On 12/19/2017 01:04 PM, cooloutac wrote: > On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 10:05:49 AM UTC-5, Vincent Adultman wrote: >> Hi all >> >> >> >> We were chatting today in IRC about current user expectations and >> experiences with the 4 release candidates. While many are happily testing >> there are

Re: [qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-19 Thread Mike Freemon
On 12/19/2017 01:04 PM, cooloutac wrote: > On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 10:05:49 AM UTC-5, Vincent Adultman wrote: >> Hi all >> >> >> >> We were chatting today in IRC about current user expectations and >> experiences with the 4 release candidates. While many are happily testing >> there are

[qubes-users] Re: 3.2.1 / An updated 3.2 iso?

2017-12-19 Thread cooloutac
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 10:05:49 AM UTC-5, Vincent Adultman wrote: > Hi all > > > > We were chatting today in IRC about current user expectations and experiences > with the 4 release candidates. While many are happily testing there are > indeed some visitors who drop by with the