-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:08:03PM -0800, jkitt wrote:
> The point is that the security of a grsecurity protected system depends on
> the userspace being compiled in a special way. The binaries need to be
> compiled with pie, and shared objects
W dniu wtorek, 22 listopada 2016 19:57:56 UTC+1 użytkownik kev27 napisał:
> I saw this being retweeted by the Qubes account on Twitter. Can Grsec support
> still land in Qubes 4.0, or should we expect it for 4.1 or 4.2, etc?
>
> I think if Grsec would be enabled by default in Qubes, it would be
On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 8:52:01 AM UTC-5, jkitt wrote:
> On Friday, 25 November 2016 11:38:21 UTC, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> > can you just tell us the options so we can compile it ourselves? paste the
> > cfg or something.
>
>
On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 8:52:01 AM UTC-5, jkitt wrote:
> On Friday, 25 November 2016 11:38:21 UTC, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> > can you just tell us the options so we can compile it ourselves? paste the
> > cfg or something.
>
>
On Friday, 25 November 2016 11:38:21 UTC, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> can you just tell us the options so we can compile it ourselves? paste the
> cfg or something.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened/FAQ#Do_I_need_to_pass_any_flags_to_LDFLAGS.2FCFLAGS_in_order_to_turn_on_hardened_building.3F
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 7:57:56 PM UTC+1, kev27 wrote:
> I saw this being retweeted by the Qubes account on Twitter. Can Grsec support
> still land in Qubes 4.0, or should we expect it for 4.1 or 4.2, etc?
>
> I think if Grsec would be enabled by default in Qubes, it would be no
>
On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 6:38:21 AM UTC-5, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 6:34:08 PM UTC-5, jkitt wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:49:07 UTC, Ronald Duncan wrote:
> > > Will this be using the latest linux kernel since grsecurity only provide
> > >
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 6:34:08 PM UTC-5, jkitt wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:49:07 UTC, Ronald Duncan wrote:
> > Will this be using the latest linux kernel since grsecurity only provide
> > the latest version free.
>
> Yes, it will be an "unstable" kernel. A bare metal
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:49:07 UTC, Ronald Duncan wrote:
> Will this be using the latest linux kernel since grsecurity only provide the
> latest version free.
Yes, it will be an "unstable" kernel. A bare metal grsec kernel is actually
available in Debian's testing repo. However, it is
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 18:58:33 UTC, kev27 wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 8:57:56 PM UTC+2, kev27 wrote:
> > I saw this being retweeted by the Qubes account on Twitter. Can Grsec
> > support still land in Qubes 4.0, or should we expect it for 4.1 or 4.2, etc?
> >
> > I think if
Will this be using the latest linux kernel since grsecurity only provide the
latest version free.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 8:57:56 PM UTC+2, kev27 wrote:
> I saw this being retweeted by the Qubes account on Twitter. Can Grsec support
> still land in Qubes 4.0, or should we expect it for 4.1 or 4.2, etc?
>
> I think if Grsec would be enabled by default in Qubes, it would be no
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
