Re: [qubes-users] Re: Why not a Whonix (or TOR) Disposible VM?

2016-08-31 Thread Patrick Schleizer
Adi Carlisle: > On Saturday, 27 August 2016 18:50:20 UTC+1, Cube wrote: >> This would be more in the style of Tails - no persistent state. > > TAILS hvm? > Would require disposable HVM, I don't think Qubes has implemented that at this time. Also DispVMs do not feature anti-forensics yet: http

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Why not a Whonix (or TOR) Disposible VM?

2016-08-27 Thread Jeremy Rand
Cube: > On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 10:50:20 AM UTC-7, Cube wrote: >> This would be more in the style of Tails - no persistent state. > > Wups, there is some thought on this already > > https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Qubes/Disposable_VM > > There are issues, anybody try this? I use Whonix as a

[qubes-users] Re: Why not a Whonix (or TOR) Disposible VM?

2016-08-27 Thread Adi Carlisle
On Saturday, 27 August 2016 18:50:20 UTC+1, Cube wrote: > This would be more in the style of Tails - no persistent state. TAILS hvm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

[qubes-users] Re: Why not a Whonix (or TOR) Disposible VM?

2016-08-27 Thread Cube
On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 10:50:20 AM UTC-7, Cube wrote: > This would be more in the style of Tails - no persistent state. Wups, there is some thought on this already https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Qubes/Disposable_VM There are issues, anybody try this? -- You received this message because