Re: [qubes-users] Re: question on 'service-name' for the new (R4.2) qrexec policy

2024-02-13 Thread Boryeu Mao
Thanks very much -- the details helped a lot. Case closed. On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 5:21:05 AM UTC-8 Rusty Bird wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Boryeu Mao: > > > For R4.1.2 I had some RPC calls with + and - characters in the file > > > name. These are

Re: [qubes-users] Re: question on 'service-name' for the new (R4.2) qrexec policy

2024-02-13 Thread 'Rusty Bird' via qubes-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Boryeu Mao: > > For R4.1.2 I had some RPC calls with + and - characters in the file > > name. These are considered as invalid characters to be part of service > > names in the new qrexec policy format (e.g. in > >

[qubes-users] Re: question on 'service-name' for the new (R4.2) qrexec policy

2024-02-12 Thread Boryeu Mao
Correction - only + is considered as invalid character. On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 4:56:27 PM UTC-8 Boryeu Mao wrote: > For R4.1.2 I had some RPC calls with + and - characters in the file > name. These are considered as invalid characters to be part of service > names in the new qrexec