Re: [qubes-users] Risks of Dual-Boot?

2016-07-30 Thread Fabian Wloch
Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2016 01:22:48 UTC+2 schrieb Andrew David Wong: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2016-07-30 16:06, Fabian Wloch wrote: > > Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2016 23:25:05 UTC+2 schrieb Markus Kilås: > >> On 07/30/2016 06:25 PM, Fabian Wloch wrote: The issues with

Re: [qubes-users] Risks of Dual-Boot?

2016-07-30 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-07-30 16:06, Fabian Wloch wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2016 23:25:05 UTC+2 schrieb Markus Kilås: >> On 07/30/2016 06:25 PM, Fabian Wloch wrote: The issues with unprotected >> /boot and BIOS is briefly mentioned on the below link and it

Re: [qubes-users] Risks of Dual-Boot?

2016-07-30 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 07/30/2016 09:24 PM, Markus Kilås wrote: > On 07/30/2016 06:25 PM, Fabian Wloch wrote: >> didn't found anything > The issues with unprotected /boot and BIOS is briefly mentioned on the > below link and it sounds like AEM should be able to at least be able to > detect a compromise for you: > >

Re: [qubes-users] Risks of Dual-Boot?

2016-07-30 Thread Markus Kilås
On 07/30/2016 06:25 PM, Fabian Wloch wrote: > didn't found anything The issues with unprotected /boot and BIOS is briefly mentioned on the below link and it sounds like AEM should be able to at least be able to detect a compromise for you: https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/multiboot/ Cheers, Markus

[qubes-users] Risks of Dual-Boot?

2016-07-30 Thread Fabian Wloch
Hello, there are plenty threads of people asking for advice for dual boot, but this is not my intention here. What I would like to know is, what are the risks of a Qubes-Dualboot System? Let's assume I have installed the latest version of Qubes, Encrypted the whole drive using LUKS (and a 32