Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-21 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/20/16 03:41, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: >> On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-20 Thread entr0py
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: >> On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: >>> > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5,

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-20 Thread entr0py
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: >> On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: >>> > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5,

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-20 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: > On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: > >> 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: > > > >>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-19 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: > On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: >> 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: > >>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5, george wrote: Yes. I get the same issue too. I can read

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-19 Thread Daniel Moerner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/19/2016 06:43 AM, Andrew David Wong wrote: > Sorry, this is a known issue. Enigmail 1.9 is incompatible with > Split GPG on Debian 8: > > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2170 > > Until this is resolved, I recommend using the

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-19 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: > 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: > >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5, george wrote: >>> Yes. I get the same issue too. I can read the message, but I can't write, >>> and I'm also

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-17 Thread cubit
17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5, george wrote: >> Yes. I get the same issue too. I can read the message, but I can't write, >> and I'm also in Debian-8 VM on Qubes 3.2, with Enigmail and Thunderbird. I >> can READ messages, but I

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-17 Thread dmoerner
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5, george wrote: > Yes. I get the same issue too. I can read the message, but I can't write, and > I'm also in Debian-8 VM on Qubes 3.2, with Enigmail and Thunderbird. I can > READ messages, but I can't send them, nor verify/encrypt/sign them.

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-11-16 Thread george
On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 11:17:53 AM UTC-4, cubit wrote: > 4. Oct 2016 19:40 by cu...@tutanota.com: > I upgraded enigmail to v 1.9.5 and it did not go as well as planned.   From > what I read of the qubes documents there were nothing to change in qubes > settings to take into account the

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-10-21 Thread cubit
9. Oct 2016 15:17 by cu...@tutanota.com: > > Has anyone experienced problems with using Splig GPG with Thunderbird and > Enigmail 1.9.5 in Debian 8 appVM?   Have also tried to build the AppVM > and TB install from scratch instead of simpli upgrading enigmail with > existing AppVM.   When

Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

2016-10-09 Thread cubit
4. Oct 2016 19:40 by cu...@tutanota.com: > > I upgraded enigmail to v 1.9.5 and it did not go as well as planned.   From > what I read of the qubes documents there were nothing to change in qubes > settings to take into account the GnuPG2 requrement now. > > > > > But when I run thunderbird

Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?

2016-10-04 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-10-04 07:09, cubit wrote: > Hello > > I am using an older version of Enigmail as during the time Split GPG and > enigmail did not seem to work well together. Enigmail expecting gpg2 while > split gpg on qubes was offering gpg1. > > If I

[qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?

2016-10-04 Thread cubit
Hello I am using an older version of Enigmail as during the time Split GPG and enigmail did not seem to work well together.  Enigmail expecting gpg2 while split gpg on qubes was offering gpg1. If I want to upgrade my enigmail to the latest is there anything I need to do to the split GPG set