Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes not shutting down

On Sunday, 20 November 2016 04:56:03 UTC+11, Loren Rogers wrote: > Another correlation I've noticed is that my machine randomly shuts > itself down without warning when I'm browsing in the Anon-Whonix VM. It > seems that simply having the Whonix browser open causes the problem. > I've not been

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 10:15:44 AM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > what do you think of "qvm-copy-to-vm backupvm ." followed by rdiff-backup > > on the backupvm to luks encrypted disks? > > It's better, but personally I wouldn't do that either. how would you do

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes not shutting down

On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 3:13:26 PM UTC-5, Loren Rogers wrote: > On 11/16/2016 02:33 PM, Grzesiek Chodzicki wrote: > > W dniu środa, 16 listopada 2016 20:04:14 UTC+1 użytkownik Loren Rogers > > napisał: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've successfully installed Qubes on my Thinkpad X201 tablet,

Re: [qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

On Monday, 21 November 2016 14:31:10 UTC+11, Andrew wrote: > Drew White: > > Still getting Dom0 crash / parts not responding. > > > > Primarily it's a guest that causes the whole of Dom0 to slow and stop. > > > > I have yet to find out what the root cause it, but it's still locking > > things

Re: [qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

Drew White: > Still getting Dom0 crash / parts not responding. > > Primarily it's a guest that causes the whole of Dom0 to slow and stop. > > I have yet to find out what the root cause it, but it's still locking things > up. > > Sometimes after running a guest for a few hours will cause the

Re: [qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Drew White wrote: > How do I reproduce the issue on upstream XEN when I run Qubes and keep > working and doing my stuff without wasting several weeks on testing it on > upstream XEN? I don't know, but seeing as you're the only person who

Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24 template available for Qubes 3.2

On 2016-11-14 23:57, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:14:19PM +, Gaijin wrote: systemctl doesn't show anything abnormal systemctl --all shows several not found inactive dead listings ex. livesys.service

Re: [qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

On Monday, 21 November 2016 12:11:39 UTC+11, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote: > If I were you I would try to see if you can reproduce the issue with > upstream xen, and then ask on the xen mailing list. > > It sounds more like a this-xen-version + this-linux-version on > your-hardware problem than a

Re: [qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

If I were you I would try to see if you can reproduce the issue with upstream xen, and then ask on the xen mailing list. It sounds more like a this-xen-version + this-linux-version on your-hardware problem than a qubes problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[qubes-users] Any chance the freezing could be resolved?

Still getting Dom0 crash / parts not responding. Primarily it's a guest that causes the whole of Dom0 to slow and stop. I have yet to find out what the root cause it, but it's still locking things up. Sometimes after running a guest for a few hours will cause the system to start having a

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: >> On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: >>> > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5,

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: >> On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: >>> > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:21:33 PM UTC-5,

[qubes-users] Re: No Ethernet (Broadcom BCM5764M)

Thanks for the reply, Drew. Sounds like a worst-case scenario, but I'll do my best. Meanwhile, if anyone else has any other pointers, please share. At least two of us could use the help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To

[qubes-users] Re: No Ethernet (Broadcom BCM5764M)

On Monday, 21 November 2016 07:26:38 UTC+11, television.v...@gmail.com wrote: > Wired networking is not working on a fresh install of Qubes 3.2. > > The motherboard has two built-in NICs, both Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5764M PCIe > (rev 10). > > Here's what I've tried thus far: > > 1. Both

Re: [qubes-users] AppVMs with pci devices attached don't start

On 2016-11-20 15:15, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:53:30PM -0500, eldor...@riseup.net wrote: Hi! After upgrading dom0 and fedora-23 templates two days ago i can't run any appvm that has pci devices like sys-net

[qubes-users] Fedora 24 Template for Qubes 3.1?

Hi, since Qubes 3.1 is supported until 2017-03-29 according to https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/supported-versions/ does that mean we will see a Fedora 24 template for R3.1 before Fedora 23 reaches EOL? thanks, Joonas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 07:02:28AM -0800, pixel fairy wrote: > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 8:07:58 AM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > > This is risky. If one of your VMs is compromised, it may try to exploit > > some bug in

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 8:07:58 AM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > This is risky. If one of your VMs is compromised, it may try to exploit > some bug in filesystem handling code, or rsync, to steal data from other > VMs. > Handling this at block device level (so do not mount,

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:04:03PM +0100, David Hobach wrote: > On 11/20/2016 12:35 PM, Franz wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stickstoff wrote: > > > > > Hello dear new qubes family, > > > > > > I am having

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Kaspersky OS

I'm not sure if it is, or if it is open source. But he didn't mentioned it at all in his blog post ( https://eugene.kaspersky.com/2016/11/15/finally-our-own-os-oh-yes/) If I would make such an operating system, I would at least mention that it will be open source, if it would be. He didn't,

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

On 11/20/2016 12:35 PM, Franz wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stickstoff wrote: Hello dear new qubes family, I am having trouble designing a backup concept for my qubes workstation. My goal is to have a (daily) copy of the entire workstation on a trusted remote

Re: Enigmial and Splig GPG2 (previously Re: [qubes-users] Upgrading from Split GPG1 to Split GPG2?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Andrew David Wong wrote: > On 2016-11-19 03:43, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > On 2016-11-17 10:05, cubit wrote: > >> 17. Nov 2016 15:33 by dmoer...@gmail.com: > > > >>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at

Re: [qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stickstoff wrote: > Hello dear new qubes family, > > I am having trouble designing a backup concept for my qubes workstation. > My goal is to have a (daily) copy of the entire workstation on a trusted > remote backup target (versioning,

[qubes-users] Access all vm data from a backup-vm?

Hello dear new qubes family, I am having trouble designing a backup concept for my qubes workstation. My goal is to have a (daily) copy of the entire workstation on a trusted remote backup target (versioning, encryption, rotation is done remotely). Only a small part of the local data ("vault")

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Kaspersky OS

Am 20.11.2016 um 05:44 schrieb Fabian Wloch: > And: Probably nothing will run on that Kaspersky OS, because its coded > from scratch. No browser, no email client etc. What would the be needed for? It's obviously not the intended use anyway. As soon as there is a user in front of a terminal,

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Kaspersky OS

Am 20.11.2016 um 05:26 schrieb Sec Tester: > Dam maybe this could be a new super hardened VM for Qubes..? All we get is a heap of paper. And a switch I could not even pre-order yet. But I've got a few Qubes systems happily running. It might be an ideal solution for the outward-facing VMs

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Kaspersky OS

The article i read failed to mention it was close source... Totally agree if thats the case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[qubes-users] HCL - Dell OptiPlex 780

ubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/6b4dc7fc-3d0e-4d6c-b8d4-f66e1f178296%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Qubes-HCL-Dell_Inc_-OptiPlex_780_-20161120-