Re: [qubes-users] Re: amd gpu's

On Thu, December 28, 2017 2:42 am, cooloutac wrote: > On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 8:40:03 PM UTC-5, Styles Grant wrote: > >> Obviously theres some issues with amd discreet gpu and qubes, to put it >> slightly. Uh, theres one example on the hardware compatibility list >> that stood out

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On 12/27/2017 11:05 PM, cooloutac wrote: sorry for the spam I don't mean to make fun. You only do that to yourself. You are immature and you are going to get someone killed if you keep this up. Basically I can't see it being easier to exploit the ps/2 then usb. For one how can you spoof

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 11:05:22 PM UTC-5, cooloutac wrote: > sorry for the spam I don't mean to make fun. Basically I can't see it being > easier to exploit the ps/2 then usb. For one how can you spoof a device? > And there is no other free ports, so can't have multiple devices.

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

sorry for the spam I don't mean to make fun. Basically I can't see it being easier to exploit the ps/2 then usb. For one how can you spoof a device? And there is no other free ports, so can't have multiple devices. It seems to me you should be more worried about the actual keyboard you are

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

Just realized that you prefer to have mouse and kb on the same usb controller rather then using ps/2 port. Who do you think is tapping the "ground wire" of your keyboard? Is it the CIA? hehe... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users"

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 10:27:28 PM UTC-5, tai...@gmx.com wrote: > On 12/27/2017 09:40 PM, cooloutac wrote: > > > I would suggest, as advice I followed from qubes docs, is to just try to > > find a board that has a manual describing iommu/vt-d options as available. > > Preferably

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On 12/27/2017 09:40 PM, cooloutac wrote: I would suggest, as advice I followed from qubes docs, is to just try to find a board that has a manual describing iommu/vt-d options as available. Preferably manual stating its on by default. The best of all scenarios being a manual that shows a

Re: [qubes-users] How to install software on templates (Qubes 4.0)

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 7:49:55 PM UTC-5, Eric Scoles wrote: > I don't know what you're asking me to try. you can connect to the fedora repos but nothing else. unless that program comes from 3rd party repo it should just work. have you tried the 2016 version? That one is beta

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On 12/27/2017 04:50 PM, Marco Silva wrote: Pretty much any server hardware will work fine, personally I'm running a Tyan S7050 motherboard with a couple of E5-2667 V2 CPU's and 64gb of samsung ddr 3 ecc ram a couple of ssd's in (fake) raid 0 and 2 AMD gpu's. Unless you're pretty paranoid I

[qubes-users] Re: Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 9:44:05 PM UTC-5, cooloutac wrote: > On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-5, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 4:55:39 PM UTC-8, dangm...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Seems to be working, as I am now halfway done with

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes OS and latest hardware (8700K)

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 3:37:17 AM UTC-5, vuojo...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 3:19:02 PM UTC+2, Chris wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > will Qubes OS 3.2 work with the 8700K desktop CPU that was just released? > > I've heard conflicting reports. If not,

Re: Mozilla (was: Re: [qubes-users] Password security/disposable vm security)

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-5, Tom Zander wrote: > On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 00:34:38 CET Leo Gaspard wrote: > > > I'm more concerned that they tried then how they failed. > > > It leaves a bad taste in my mouth. > > > tl;dr: please do google for “looking glass” and

[qubes-users] Re: Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-5, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 4:55:39 PM UTC-8, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > > Seems to be working, as I am now halfway done with the download with only 2 > > more hours to go. > > After several hours of

[qubes-users] Re: amd gpu's

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 8:40:03 PM UTC-5, Styles Grant wrote: > Obviously theres some issues with amd discreet gpu and qubes, to put it > slightly. Uh, theres one example on the hardware compatibility list that > stood out though as a bit of encouragement > > "ASRock AB350 Pro4 >

[qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 3:23:18 PM UTC-5, Wael Nasreddine wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking to build a new Desktop specifically for Qubes OS, so my most > important requirement is compatibility. I currently have 64GB (4 x 16GB) > 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3400 (PC4 27200)[0] that I'd like

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

I currently have an ASRock Z170 Pro4 and an i7-6700k and I found it crashing from time to time for no particular reason, I might give the AMD Ryzen

[qubes-users] amd gpu's

Obviously theres some issues with amd discreet gpu and qubes, to put it slightly. Uh, theres one example on the hardware compatibility list that stood out though as a bit of encouragement "ASRock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 1600 AMD AMD Radeon HD" Uh, I'd like to try. I've had others have lots of

[qubes-users] Re: Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 4:55:39 PM UTC-8, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > Seems to be working, as I am now halfway done with the download with only 2 > more hours to go. After several hours of downloading, the connection was dropped (24hr captive portal), and now I have to start all over

[qubes-users] Re: How to install software on templates (Qubes 4.0)

I've tried manually placing the Softmaker Office 2018 RPM into the fedora-25 template and installing is using 'rpm' from the command line. This did cause the applications to become available in templates, but they won't run because apparently the RPM creates files in user space. Next up I'll

[qubes-users] WiFi usb adapter does not work (inconstantly "iwlist wlan0 scan" works, NetworkManager does not)

Hello, My WiFi usb adapter does not work in my NetVM "sys-wifi" while driver is installed. Settings: - fresh Qubes 3.2 installation (+ recent updates) - TemplateVM Fedora 25 (+ recent updates, + dkms installed, + newest wifi driver for my device (https://github.com/lwfinger/rtl8188eu)

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes in a corporate network behind HTTP proxy

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:57:26PM -0800, pr0xy wrote: > On 2017-12-19 15:33, Unman wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 03:09:05PM +0100, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-users > > wrote: > >> On Monday, 18 December 2017 10:13:48 CET pr0xy wrote: > >> > I am still a bit stuck concerning the Qubes Update

[qubes-users] Re: Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 6:02:57 PM UTC-8, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > Attempting to upgrade KeePassX to KeePassX 2.0, using backports, borked my > debian template by removing qubes-gui-agent and pulseaudio. > > Was unable to find way to undo damage. > > Opted to reinstall template,

Re: [qubes-users] How to install software on templates (Qubes 4.0)

I don't know what you're asking me to try. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:05:22PM -0800, dangmad...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 6:02:57 PM UTC-8, dangm...@gmail.com wrote: > > Attempting to upgrade KeePassX to KeePassX 2.0, using backports, borked my > > debian template by removing qubes-gui-agent and pulseaudio. > >

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes 4.0 rc3 Windows ISO issues

So I managed to get past this bug by starting a fresh VM and using qvm-prefs kernel parameter set to ''. This results in the VM at least recognizing the iso and starting the windows installation process. Unfortunately it crashes at the Windows logo. Looking around it does look like others are

Re: [qubes-users] Which 3.2 VMs to backup and for eventual 4.0 migration?

On Tue, December 26, 2017 8:48 pm, yreb...@riseup.net wrote: > On 2017-12-26 10:14, awokd wrote: > >> On Tue, December 26, 2017 7:15 pm, yreb...@riseup.net wrote: >> >>> fwiw, I am unable to actually add backupVM diskspace for the same >>> reason, duh. I think my only option is to remove the huge

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Lenovo G505s with Coreboot and Qubes R4-rc3 fails to boot

On Wed, December 27, 2017 6:05 pm, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > What version of coreboot are you using, they are removing AGESA from the > latest versions due to some dumb choices by the leadership. I'm not sure that's accurate. From the thread on the Coreboot mailing list a few months ago, it

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

Pretty much any server hardware will work fine, personally I'm running a Tyan S7050 motherboard with a couple of E5-2667 V2 CPU's and 64gb of samsung ddr 3 ecc ram a couple of ssd's in (fake) raid 0 and 2 AMD gpu's. Unless you're pretty paranoid I wouldn't go with really old and slow hardware.

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:48 AM taii...@gmx.com wrote: > I would buy the RAM and CPU off of ebay, there is no reason to pay > $80/ea for that ram or $172 for a 6380 ($100 on ebay) you could get a > 6386SE for that price. (needs 140W cooler FYI) No reason to get the > "protection

[qubes-users] Re: Mozilla

On 12/27/2017 07:38 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > On 12/26/2017 06:34 PM, Leo Gaspard wrote: > >> (disclaimer: I once was an intern for Mozilla, though I do not have any >> bond with Mozilla right now) >> >> tl;dr: please do google for “looking glass” and “mozilla” >> >> Erhm. This is a *really*

Re: [qubes-users] Re: new Desktop build recommendation

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:48 AM taii...@gmx.com wrote: > > I would buy the RAM and CPU off of ebay, there is no reason to pay > $80/ea for that ram or $172 for a 6380 ($100 on ebay) you could get a > 6386SE for that price. (needs 140W cooler FYI) No reason to get the >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Lenovo G505s with Coreboot and Qubes R4-rc3 fails to boot

Le mercredi 27 décembre 2017 19:05:40 UTC+1, tai...@gmx.com a écrit : > What version of coreboot are you using, they are removing AGESA from the > latest versions due to some dumb choices by the leadership. > > I would use v4.6, it is what I use. I use 4.6 too, it's the current version. (to be

Re: [qubes-users] Weak connection. Cannot reinstall borked template, download will not resume.

On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 03:02:57 CET dangmad...@gmail.com wrote: > Opted to reinstall template, but I cannot download it without my > connection dropping, and thus timing me out. dnf does not resume the > download, despite it claiming to be saving the download to cache. > > I have put

[qubes-users] Re: Mozilla

On 12/26/2017 06:34 PM, Leo Gaspard wrote: (disclaimer: I once was an intern for Mozilla, though I do not have any bond with Mozilla right now) tl;dr: please do google for “looking glass” and “mozilla” Erhm. This is a *really* biased way of putting things. They did push an (opt-out) study

Re: Mozilla (was: Re: [qubes-users] Password security/disposable vm security)

On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 00:34:38 CET Leo Gaspard wrote: > > I'm more concerned that they tried then how they failed. > > It leaves a bad taste in my mouth. > tl;dr: please do google for “looking glass” and “mozilla” Its good we agree on all the technical details, and I agree intent is

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Lenovo G505s with Coreboot and Qubes R4-rc3 fails to boot

What version of coreboot are you using, they are removing AGESA from the latest versions due to some dumb choices by the leadership. I would use v4.6, it is what I use. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [qubes-users] Dell XPS 850 Desktop

On 12/27/2017 10:35 AM, juh wrote: Hi all, Yo sup. the Dell XPS 850 Desktop does not show up in the HCL. It is several years old and has an Intel® Core™ i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz × 8 There is a LITEONIT LMT-32L3M (LWDA) with 32 GB SSD and a 2TB hard disk. Has anyone installed Qubes on this

[qubes-users] Dell XPS 850 Desktop

Hi all, the Dell XPS 850 Desktop does not show up in the HCL. It is several years old and has an Intel® Core™ i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz × 8 There is a LITEONIT LMT-32L3M (LWDA) with 32 GB SSD and a 2TB hard disk. Has anyone installed Qubes on this model? I can install an additionally 120 GB SSD to

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Lenovo G505S Coreboot

Tuesday 26 December 2017 г., 15:18:14 UTC+0 user Blooorp wrote: > Le mardi 26 décembre 2017 00:05:28 UTC+1, tai...@gmx.com a écrit : > > On 12/25/2017 12:16 PM, Blooorp wrote: > > > > > Le lundi 25 décembre 2017 16:27:11 UTC+1, awokd a écrit : > > >> On Mon, December 25, 2017 3:07 pm, Blooorp

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes OS and latest hardware (8700K)

On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 3:19:02 PM UTC+2, Chris wrote: > Hi, > > > > will Qubes OS 3.2 work with the 8700K desktop CPU that was just released? > I've heard conflicting reports. If not, will 4.0 support it? I read that you > need Kernel 4.12 (I believe) but even Qubes 4.0 seems to be