On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 10:44:06 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-08-16 18:46, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 8:25:03 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > On 2016-08-16 17:20,
The Qubes website recommends SSD drives.
Is there any particular reason..?
Does Qubes use read/write to the hard drive any more than Windows... to the
point where it's going to cause drive failure a lot earlier..?
Or is it simply a speed thing..?
Or what.?
--
You received this message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 18:46, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 8:25:03 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2016-08-16 17:20, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I need to install bumblebee for better power
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 18:06, eobail...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 02:15:32 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:07:24AM -0700, Andrew David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 17:19, Drew White wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 07:13:06 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
>>
>> The updated package is uploaded to testing repository for Qubes 3.2.
>>
>
> So how do I get the package for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 17:18, Drew White wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 02:11:15 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>> Are you referring to this issue?
>>
>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1896
>>
>> If so, it looks like it was closed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 17:20, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Unfortunately, I need to install bumblebee for better power management for
> my laptop. Copying over the rpms and installing them are easy enough but
> my concern is with any dependencies that may be
Unfortunately, I need to install bumblebee for better power management for my
laptop. Copying over the rpms and installing them are easy enough but my
concern is with any dependencies that may be needed
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users"
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 07:13:06 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> The updated package is uploaded to testing repository for Qubes 3.2.
>
So how do I get the package for the multi-monitor then?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 02:11:15 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> Are you referring to this issue?
>
> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1896
>
> If so, it looks like it was closed recently, so the patch should be available
> for testing soon.
>
> > Will the tools be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 13:29, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know it's unsecure and that the tempory elevation menioned in the update
> dom0 page has been removed. So is there some way I can give network
> access to the dom0 so I can add the bumblebee repo?
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 06:29:21 UTC+10, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know it's unsecure and that the tempory elevation menioned in the update
> dom0 page has been removed. So is there some way I can give network access to
> the dom0 so I can add the bumblebee repo?
You need to enter it
On 08/16/2016 06:56 AM, kotot...@gmail.com wrote:
To test this theory, you could put a 7sec delay in qubes-vpn-handler.sh
right before the line 'iptables -t nat -F PR-QBS'. Then the right IPs
should appear in PR-QBS.
It did work. Thank you again!
I wonder what is changing the NAT rules. I only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:14:57AM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2016-08-16 00:26, Drew White wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 11:33:18 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> >> The issue for this was recently closed:
> >>
> >>
I know it's unsecure and that the tempory elevation menioned in the update dom0
page has been removed. So is there some way I can give network access to the
dom0 so I can add the bumblebee repo?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 3:21:14 PM UTC-4, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 3:10:14 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 2016-08-16 10:40, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 3:10:14 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-08-16 10:40, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:38:08 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > On 2016-08-16 10:35,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 10:40, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:38:08 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2016-08-16 10:35, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:55:03PM +0200, donoban wrote:
> Hi
>
> The computer which I upgraded from 3.1 to 3.2 is having some
> performance problems when I have a few VMs running. It has a non-SSD
> hard disk so I know it's going to do a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/16/2016 08:42 PM, Chris Laprise wrote:
> Each vm has its own swap. If you misconfigure the vm with too
> little memory (this can easily happen if you inadvertently turn off
> memory balancing) then it can exhibit the symptoms you describe.
>
On 08/16/2016 01:39 PM, donoban wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/16/2016 06:17 PM, Andrew David Wong wrote:
On 2016-08-16 03:58, donoban wrote:
I also have experienced a lot of process killed because I run out
of memory. This never happened with 3.1.
Is it
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:38:08 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-08-16 10:35, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > On 2016-08-16 10:27,
entr0py:
> donoban:
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
>> 3n7r0...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't had a chance to try out 3.2rc yet. Can someone please tell
>>> me what the default DM is to launch XFCE4? Thanks!
>>>
>>
>>
>> It is the same of Qubes 3.1, lightdm if I'm not wrong.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 10:35, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2016-08-16 10:27, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been trying to install the drivers for my bcm4352 but I\ve been
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-4, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-08-16 10:27, zackp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I've been trying to install the drivers for my bcm4352 but I\ve been
> > unable so far. I'm on 3.2 rc2. Here's what
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:27:11 PM UTC-4, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've been trying to install the drivers for my bcm4352 but I\ve been unable
> so far. I'm on 3.2 rc2. Here's what I'm trying to do:
>
>
> su -c 'dnf install
>
I've been trying to install the drivers for my bcm4352 but I\ve been unable so
far. I'm on 3.2 rc2. Here's what I'm trying to do:
su -c 'dnf install
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-$(rpm -E
%fedora).noarch.rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 10:07, entr0py wrote:
> According to:
>
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/backup-restore/
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/qubes-users/
> backup$20encryption|sort:relevance/qubes-users/sS4A3vJdCQ8/w9-jIj5VW9oJ
>
> Qubes
donoban:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
> 3n7r0...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I haven't had a chance to try out 3.2rc yet. Can someone please tell
>> me what the default DM is to launch XFCE4? Thanks!
>>
>
>
> It is the same of Qubes 3.1, lightdm if I'm not wrong.
>
Thanks. Somewhat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 08:44, neilhard...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anybody have any rough idea of the Qubes 4.0 release date...?
>
No official release date has been announced yet, but to get an idea, you can
take a look at the currently open issues for 4.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 03:58, donoban wrote:
> I also have experienced a lot of process killed because I run out of
> memory. This never happened with 3.1.
>
Is it possible that the high HDD activity is excessive swap usage due to low
memory?
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:07:24AM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2016-08-16 00:18, eobail...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry for the misunderstanding. You do not have to (and, indeed, cannot)
> >> update your TemplateBasedVMs from Fedora 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 00:26, Drew White wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 11:33:18 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>> The issue for this was recently closed:
>>
>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1704
>>
>> Rafał, is the fix for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 00:24, Drew White wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 11:40:44 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>> Here it is:
>>
>> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/windows-appvms/
>>
>> I'll update that other page. Thanks!
>>
>
> I see the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 00:18, eobail...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the misunderstanding. You do not have to (and, indeed, cannot)
>> update your TemplateBasedVMs from Fedora 21 to Fedora 23, since they're
>> Template-based.
>
> Normally speaking,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-08-16 00:30, Adi Carlisle wrote:
> Ok ithis instance im dding from rufus/windows10 If i wipe metadata before i
> dd to disk will there be any after the write process?
>
I'm not sure what you mean by "wipe metadata before" I suppose it
One of the banes of a Qubes addict's existence is memory.
Too many times I see that red stop sign and breathe a sigh of frustration,
that I need to shut down or mem-set other VM's to start up another AppVM.
I like my VM separation, dammit, which means lots of VMs.
In a perfect world, I'd have a
>> However, under Qubes, I experience random screen corruption.
>>
>> See: https://i.imgur.com/ovEFgYO.png
> Looks like it could be this issue:
>
> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1028
>
> As you can see from the qubes-builder-github comments, some patches for
> this
> are already
I also have experienced a lot of process killed because I run out of
memory. This never happened with 3.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
> To test this theory, you could put a 7sec delay in qubes-vpn-handler.sh
> right before the line 'iptables -t nat -F PR-QBS'. Then the right IPs
> should appear in PR-QBS.
It did work. Thank you again!
I wonder what is changing the NAT rules. I only see one 'up' directive in the
openvpn
Hi
The computer which I upgraded from 3.1 to 3.2 is having some
performance problems when I have a few VMs running. It has a non-SSD
hard disk so I know it's going to do a bottleneck and I don't expect a
fast perform, but I'm sure that it's running very worse than it did
with 3.1.
Using iotop
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
3n7r0...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to try out 3.2rc yet. Can someone please tell
> me what the default DM is to launch XFCE4? Thanks!
>
It is the same of Qubes 3.1, lightdm if I'm not wrong.
--
You received this message because you are
On Sunday, 14 August 2016 13:28:10 UTC+10, el...@tutanota.com wrote:
> > don't
> > yet know what the new system will look like, so I can't say whether a
> > folder-based system (like the app menu) will make sense, but something like
> > that could be a good idea. I've added this suggestion as a
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 11:33:18 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> The issue for this was recently closed:
>
> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1704
>
> Rafał, is the fix for this available in a testing repo (or already live)?
>
How does a person re-open the issue?
--
You
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 11:40:44 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> Here it is:
>
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/windows-appvms/
>
> I'll update that other page. Thanks!
>
I see the instructions, but has the seamless issues been resolved yet?
Or do they still remain?
Will the tools be
45 matches
Mail list logo
