[qubes-users] Re: qvm-usb not functioning

2017-09-18 Thread Marke50
On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 10:36:18 PM UTC-4, Drew White wrote: > On Friday, 15 September 2017 23:39:53 UTC+10, Marke50 wrote: > > There should be better instructions and documentation on this and working > > with hardware within the vm's > > I agree with you. But they do not really have

[qubes-users] Privacy in Qubes

2017-09-18 Thread Person
Let's say you have an online identity that you want to keep separate from your personal information. On Qubes, is it possible to keep i information completely separate without physical separation? I have considered using a separate OS virtualized in Qubes, but it may possibly leak the same

[qubes-users] Unable to uninstall or reinstall Whonix

2017-09-18 Thread Person
I use Qubes-Whonix (precisely Qubes 3.2), and when I try to remove the Whonix Template VMs after removing the anon-whonix VM, it says that the command I used to remove is not found. Also, the Whonix template VMs no longer work. I also tried to just install Whonix, but dom0 replies with "Update

[qubes-users] Re: qvm-usb not functioning

2017-09-18 Thread Drew White
On Friday, 15 September 2017 23:39:53 UTC+10, Marke50 wrote: > There should be better instructions and documentation on this and working > with hardware within the vm's I agree with you. But they do not really have decent documentation for Qubes anywhere. You ahve to get the basics then

Re: [qubes-users] qvm-usb not functioning

2017-09-18 Thread Drew White
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 05:11:47 UTC+10, P R wrote: > Hello Drew, Hi P R, > Can you provide more information: Yes I can. > - which Qubes Version? Qubes 3.2 Linux dom0 4.9.45-21.pvops.qubes.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 29 14:21:02 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > - Laptop /

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread Ted Brenner
I thought I read somewhere that VMs make it harder to fingerprint using the CPU, graphics card, etc. Did anyone else read that? That would be a feather in Qubes's hat if true. Any suggestions for a good anonymizing browser (besides the Tor browser of course)? I would assume Firefox would have the

Re: [qubes-users] Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-18 Thread Rusty Bird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 alexclay...@gmail.com: > Has anyone here successfully disabled the Intel ME yet? > > http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html > > I'm hoping a future release of Qubes integrates this into the > install process for us. Or be

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread jesset
Roger that, thank you Leo so it sounds as though Qubes ought to be up to snuff for all contemporary ad instustry practices that Google, Facebook, Doubleclick etc are liable to try but that Qubes + anonymizing browser is a better bet against more sophisticated tracking in case that were a

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes OS 4.0 without IOMMU

2017-09-18 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:46:35PM -0700, damm swing wrote: > By the way, is it possible that some AppVM could compromise NetVM (e.g. by a > hypothetical bug in Xen net backend) and then use the DMA attack? Yes, it is theoretically possible. See

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread Leo Gaspard
On 09/18/2017 09:27 PM, jes...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you Micah and Michał, but I am not actually asking about a standard as > strong as 100% bulletproof anonymity or anything. I really am just concerned > about whether any of the methods on that list that I linked to would be > enough to

Re: [qubes-users] Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-18 Thread alexclaytor
I see, thank you for the explanation. I had no idea ME versions were that fragmented. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread rysiek
Hey, Dnia Monday, September 18, 2017 12:27:21 PM CEST jes...@gmail.com pisze: > My only concern is working to ensure that to an outside observer such as > webservers and ad networks nothing short of the shared IP address (and via > Tor or VPN or different IPs honestly allocated to different

Re: [qubes-users] Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-18 Thread Alex
On 09/18/2017 10:33 PM, alexclay...@gmail.com wrote: > Has anyone here successfully disabled the Intel ME yet? > > http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html > > I'm hoping a future release of Qubes integrates this into the install > process for us. Or be downloadable as a

[qubes-users] Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-18 Thread alexclaytor
Has anyone here successfully disabled the Intel ME yet? http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html I'm hoping a future release of Qubes integrates this into the install process for us. Or be downloadable as a package like Anti-Evil Maid? Thoughts? -- You received this

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread jesset
Thank you Micah and Michał, but I am not actually asking about a standard as strong as 100% bulletproof anonymity or anything. I really am just concerned about whether any of the methods on that list that I linked to would be enough to leak cookie-like reference data between two separate Qubes

RE: [qubes-users] UEFI secureboot issue

2017-09-18 Thread Wim Vervoorn
Hello Marek, This is clear. Do you have any plans to do this in the future? Best regards, Wim Vervoorn Van: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Verzonden: zaterdag 16 september 2017 00:32 Aan: Wim Vervoorn CC:

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread rysiek
Dnia Monday, September 18, 2017 10:56:33 AM CEST Micah Lee pisze: > Qubes security domains don't necessarily help solve this problem because > really the problem is how your web browsers are configured. > > So a tracking company can't link your browsing activity between Qubes > domains -- your

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread rysiek
Hey, Dnia Monday, September 18, 2017 9:43:15 AM CEST jes...@gmail.com pisze: > In the past I have used a Firefox plugin called "Better Privacy" to try to > push back against multi-front user fingerprinting and analysis mechanisms > such as the kind used by large advertising and user demographics

Re: [qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread Micah Lee
Qubes security domains don't necessarily help solve this problem because really the problem is how your web browsers are configured. So a tracking company can't link your browsing activity between Qubes domains -- your "personal" traffic and "work" traffic might look like two separate people --

[qubes-users] Supercookies / Zombie cookies / Web Tracking — how effective are Qubes security domains against this

2017-09-18 Thread jesset
In the past I have used a Firefox plugin called "Better Privacy" to try to push back against multi-front user fingerprinting and analysis mechanisms such as the kind used by large advertising and user demographics companies which include the abuse of Flash LSOs, HTML5 local storage,

[qubes-users]

2017-09-18 Thread Rob Ward
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To

[qubes-users] Authenticating a repo?

2017-09-18 Thread Stumpy
Hi, I wanted to install icecat so I thought that it would be best to add the repo so that updates would be automc. I went thorough the steps which workd but it gave me the warning first that the repo was not authenticated and that it was a bad idea so I tried, and I dont know so much about

[qubes-users] Recording screen of appvm

2017-09-18 Thread Stumpy
Hi, I have been trying to record (vid/snd) a AppVm window with little luck. I recently tried recordmydesktop, installing it on the appvm I wanted to record, and it just about borked my system, like the entire screen turned white and I couldn't bring up a term win, or swtch to any other appvms,

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Setting up firewall for mail and seeing traffic for individual appvms?

2017-09-18 Thread Stumpy
On 18.09.2017 01:45, Unman wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:46:53PM +0200, Stumpy wrote: On 17.09.2017 23:41, Frosty wrote: > Hi Stumpy, > > Are you using sys-whonix to enter the internet? If yes you probably > have to open port 9000 on the firewall, because tor traffic goes > trough port

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0-rc2 release

2017-09-18 Thread Unman
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:24:13AM -0700, Mirosław Wojciechowski wrote: > Dear Qubes Team, > > I have one small question. > > Today is it a day when you release the new version of Qubes OS (4.0-rc2)? > I ask because I do not know whether to install or wait. > > Regards, > > MW > Marek has

[qubes-users] Qubes 4.0-rc2 release

2017-09-18 Thread Mirosław Wojciechowski
Dear Qubes Team, I have one small question. Today is it a day when you release the new version of Qubes OS (4.0-rc2)? I ask because I do not know whether to install or wait. Regards, MW -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To

Re: [qubes-users] Reboot a VM that is connected as net/proxy VM

2017-09-18 Thread mittendorf
Well, I experience this issue several times a week. On 09/14/2017 10:29 PM, Adrian Rocha wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I agree > > It isn't a critical issue, but is too annoying to restore the VMs connections > after this type of situations > -- You received this message because you are subscribed