Re: [qubes-users] Dear qubes-users
This is not spam, however this is against riseup's rules. Riseup users are not supposed to invite people they don't know personally. If it is only secure e-mail you need, and you are in an emergency, then I'd recommend protonmail. For less secure needs, I'd recommend openmailbox. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/c6cdaa99-e359-9a88-08d8-a5094a3ad7b4%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] Qubes VM compromised? - Follow up
My guess is that Paypal is giving you a hard time just because of the tor exits you use to interact with their website. So it seems to me all that you are saying is really related to using tor via sys-whonix or manually trough the traditional means. The sigaint episode is easily explained through the e-mail you provided. But yes, the Paranoia is our shepherd and nothing shall lack. Paranoia is what justifies the development of a operational system of this nature, it shall never die. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/bd3c3f0a-6a20-7f99-e486-3dc9393a5c54%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] Re: R3.2 rc2 blank screen - screenlock issue?
I'm not minimizing the importance of this. On the contrary, I'm acknowledging it as a problem and adding my experience to that -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/283c5624-29c1-fc8b-3f93-43544f471211%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] Qubes VM compromised?
On 08/23/2016 07:25 PM, Chris Laprise wrote: > What threat model does this fit? If a skilled attacker tricks you into > thinking you created an account at sigaint, but you later cannot use > it... what is the advantage of that? The possible gain seems to be > little or nothing. Well, (s)he has changed all its passwords. Tricking someone into changing all passwords has been done before. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/a0b37dd6-248c-eb36-31ce-94ad47efef54%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] Qubes VM compromised? - Follow up
On 08/25/2016 01:54 AM, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote > (Although accepting the password change on a Tor exit, and then refusing > that on a non-Tor https: connection was rather weird. Would they silently > fail a password change? Oh well, I won't stress over it, but will keep a > close eye on things, for sure. Ever vigilant...) Not weird at all, could be just the lag between the red flag raising for a given account (yours) and someone manually deciding to block your account "for security reasons" - read that as: "we crap our pants when we see tor, and we rather block your legitimate attempt to login to risk accepting a real world account hijacking". > Worst case, I could (and have successfully) just run Tails inside Qubes, > and it should be no worse (safer, actually) than Tails standalone, for > banking or email. (I was reading that the IOMMU protection prevents DMA > attacks, which is sweet.) I am too paranoid for using tails other than the reccomended method (two usb drives updating each other - I have two pairs of three). I just use Whonix within Qubes and I like it. I'm glad it comes out of the box since 3.1 Also, I would never use tor for banking, unless the banking wouldn't involve my real world name - understand that one how you want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1982b061-15a5-c452-b9b2-f2327f0cfe4e%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] Qubes VM compromised? - Follow up
On 08/25/2016 01:54 AM, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote > (Although accepting the password change on a Tor exit, and then refusing > that on a non-Tor https: connection was rather weird. Would they silently > fail a password change? Oh well, I won't stress over it, but will keep a > close eye on things, for sure. Ever vigilant...) Not weird at all, could be just the lag between the red flag raising for a given account (yours) and someone manually deciding to block your account "for security reasons" - read that as: "we crap our pants when we see tor, and we rather block your legitimate attempt to login to risk accepting a real world account hijacking". > Worst case, I could (and have successfully) just run Tails inside Qubes, > and it should be no worse (safer, actually) than Tails standalone, for > banking or email. (I was reading that the IOMMU protection prevents DMA > attacks, which is sweet.) I am too paranoid for using tails other than the reccomended method (two usb drives updating each other - I have two pairs of three). I just use Whonix within Qubes and I like it. I'm glad it comes out of the box since 3.1 Also, I would never use tor for banking, unless the banking wouldn't involve my real world name - understand that one how you want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/c82ab082-c9e4-9429-dd66-74ca3ec200f7%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [qubes-users] R3.2 rc2 blank screen - screenlock issue?
I use KDE (XFCE is installed but never used) and I don't have the option of using the keyboard. The num/caps/scroll lock lights won't change and the keyboard doesn't seem to respond. As I stated, the processes seem to be running, if there's a music player, I can still hear it. Will check SETUP settings (a.k.a. BIOS/UEFI) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/8bf93477-f017-8fc8-abed-4b44cd6475d2%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.