I'm running Qubes 4.02-rc2 on a T480 right now. Works like a charm. Would
love to help, but will need more detail about your install steps and
failure mode.
On Monday, September 23, 2019 at 10:17:08 AM UTC-7, evan.la...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed Qubes Release
https://www.platformsecuritysummit.com/2018/speaker/pratt/
A bit off topic but one of the most informative 30 minutes I’ve spent in a
while and thought I would share.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this
I’m curious what the Qubes dev community thinks of the Argo inter-domain comms
introduced in 4.12. Is it worth considering as a replacement for the current
methods used by Qubes?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe
You may want to provide some details such as model name or at least chipset and
what matters most to you in terms of what you want from Qubes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
I’ve used Quebes with an Aorus Gaming 3, which is an X299 board.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
So if you have 4 or more USB controllers isolating one for its exclusive
use for kb and mouse is safer than PS/2?
If so that eliminates one of the two main reasons I had for buying a new
mobo for Qubes. The other is that the new one has a hardware TPM and the
one w/o PS/2 only has a firmware
Thanks for all you responses and thoughts. You have presented multiple
thoughtfull easy ways to think about this in plain English while politely
pointing out the flaws on the originally posed scenario. Although there
were several no’s and I understand their choice, my answer is Yes.
On Sun, Feb
BTW, there is an excellent split config in Qubes for OTP that leverages the
standard Linux oathtool, which does exactly the same thing as Google
Authenticator, Lastpass Authenticator, etc. They all implement TOTP and
generate the same keys given the same starting key and an accurate clock.
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 11:54:57 AM UTC-8, John S.Recdep wrote:
> On 12/26/18 4:49 AM,
> brendan.hoar-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 9:56:40 PM UTC-5, John Smiley wrote:
> >> U2F Proxy is not so cool. So far no j
On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 1:07:32 AM UTC-8, John Mitchell wrote:
> On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 9:34:58 AM UTC+1, John Smiley wrote:
> > No. I knew exactly what you were talking about. That’s okay. You just keep
> > on with your mind in neutral. I won’t waste time
No. I knew exactly what you were talking about. That’s okay. You just keep on
with your mind in neutral. I won’t waste time n a closed mind.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Btw, my next hardware purchase was specifically to run Linux with minimal fuss
(Linux will run on just about anything if you invest the time to learn and
iterate on fussing with it). I didn’t want to do that (been there, done that,
too damned old to waste time) I wanted something that was as
UTC-7, John Smiley wrote:
> > I have a 1080 Ti in one of my Qubes boxes and haven't had any trouble
> with the out-of-the-box install with 4.0.1-rc2. This box is dual boot to
> Win10 when I want to play games (it was a gaming rig before it was a Qubes
> box). May I ask w
Sorry, you are woefully misinformed. I have been on the design teams for two
well known clouds. You can disprove your assertion with a simple test.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
"Starting testing with the Qubes 4 advanced features next."
Created a "twitter" qube that has exclusive access to the Yubikey key
registered with my Twitter account. That key cannot be accessed from any other
qube, just as described in the u2f proxy doc. Nice!
--
You received this message
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 1:02:05 PM UTC-8, qubenix wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Zrubi:
> > On 12/23/18 9:34 PM, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> >> Someone I know is interested in using QubesOS. However, they
> >> are also a gamer: if they could not have a
If your friend is just poking around with Qubes and doesn't have anything on
the gaming box that needs protecting, I say go with dual boot. That's what I
did. Running games from within a Xen VM is going to suck performance-wise
compared to running naively from Win10.
If he *does* have things
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 2:20:15 AM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:55:23AM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 12:52:28 AM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> > > Does it make sense to configure a VLAN and associa
On Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 6:28:48 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> WRT the U2F Proxy: I've got a desktop and a laptop running 4.0.1-rc2 that
> I've been trying out the U2F proxy with. I have a lengthy issue open on this
> documenting the problems I encountered, how I reso
WRT the U2F Proxy: I've got a desktop and a laptop running 4.0.1-rc2 that I've
been trying out the U2F proxy with. I have a lengthy issue open on this
documenting the problems I encountered, how I resolved them, and some changes I
think needed to make the docs clearer. I will probably end up
I have a 1080 Ti in one of my Qubes boxes and haven't had any trouble with the
out-of-the-box install with 4.0.1-rc2. This box is dual boot to Win10 when I
want to play games (it was a gaming rig before it was a Qubes box). May I ask
what you need to do that requires the Nividia driver?
--
On Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, seshu wrote:
> On Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 3:40:06 PM UTC-7, Chris Laprise wrote:
> > On 12/27/2018 05:12 PM, seshu wrote:
> > > When I do updates of dom0 I notice it is downloading Fedora 25?
> > >
> > > I ask because I'm trying to figure
I re-read all of the docs on this topic and I think this setting determines
which dvm is used when the qube asks to open a document or run a program in a
dvm unless it specifies a specific dvm.
So the dvm given by this pref would by used by the Qube's File application when
you select a file
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:49:47 AM UTC-8, Brendan Hoar wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 9:56:40 PM UTC-5, John Smiley wrote:
> > U2F Proxy is not so cool. So far no joy getting it to work. Someone on
> > reddit
> > had similar issues and questions and r
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:56:41 AM UTC-8, Brendan Hoar wrote:
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 5:19:57 PM UTC-5, John Smiley wrote:
> > Posting here in case anyone else has seen this:
> >
> > I started a fedora-29-dvm instance to test keepass
> ...
&g
On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-7, Ted Brenner wrote:
> There are two programs I'd like to install to make Qubes more usable. First,
> I'd like to install Chrome. Second, I'd like to install Flash (though maybe I
> won't need that if I'm using Chrome?). I've searched and
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 12:52:28 AM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> Does it make sense to configure a VLAN and associated firewall rules in an
> external firewall like pfsense or can the same thing be accomplished with
> Qubes firewall rules?
For the purposes of isolating Qube
Does it make sense to configure a VLAN and associated firewall rules in an
external firewall like pfsense or can the same thing be accomplished with Qubes
firewall rules?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this
I see several posts citing 4.0rc2 when it is clear from context that they are
talking about 4.0.1-rc2. They are completely different releases. Take care to
cite the correct release in your posts.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users"
U2F Proxy is not so cool. So far no joy getting it to work. Someone on reddit
had similar issues and questions and resolved by installing USB keyboard
support. That’s not mentioned in the Qubes docs and I hope we don’t have to
resort to that. If that were a requirement, surely the docs would
I install from USB3 stick all the time and it’s fast. Even if it is dropping
back to 2.0, it should not be as slow as you describe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
I would be more concerned about security than drivers. I connected a Caldigit
Plus TB3 hub to my Qubes laptop and it worked fine, but now I had a new threat
vector since TB has direct access to the PCI bus. As someone else here noted,
there may be a time when they vector is secure, but not yet.
Posting here in case anyone else has seen this:
I started a fedora-29-dvm instance to test keepass (as opposed to the outdated
keepassx that comes installed with the fedora-29 template), installed it,
launched it from xterm, and poked at it for a bit. Part of the poking included
clicking
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 3:47:57 PM UTC-8, Laszlo Zrubecz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> Just installed the 4.0.1-rc
>
> hit by the UEFI issues described here:
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/uefi-troubleshooting/
>
> Use the workarounds, or
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 10:06:26 PM UTC-8, will.w77 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> So I'm attempting to install qubes to a usb stick. I've copied the iso onto
> the usb by using the dd command specified in the user documentation in ubuntu
> virtualbox (host os windows 10). I'm wondering if
On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 3:39:25 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:20:11PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 9:11:34 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> > > I've been having head-banging issues with 4.0 and 4.0.1-rc1 ever sin
On Friday, December 21, 2018 at 3:39:25 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:20:11PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 9:11:34 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> > > I've been having head-banging issues with 4.0 and 4.0.1-rc1 ever sin
On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 9:11:34 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> I've been having head-banging issues with 4.0 and 4.0.1-rc1 ever since I
> became a fledgling Qubes user a few weeks ago. I never did get Qubes working
> well with Whonix 14 on the desktop.
>
> When 4.0
I've been having head-banging issues with 4.0 and 4.0.1-rc1 ever since I became
a fledgling Qubes user a few weeks ago. I never did get Qubes working well
with Whonix 14 on the desktop.
When 4.0.1-rc2 came out the other day, I made a new bootable USB stick with it
and replaced Ubuntu on my
If one were to invest in a new laptop today for Qubes use exclusively and price
wasn't a major factor, which one(s) make the top of the list? Assume you want
the best security possible and are willing to invest the time to learn and
configure Qubes/Whonix to get it. Also assume you want
On Monday, December 17, 2018 at 12:09:48 PM UTC-8, stefanne...@gmail.com wrote:
> With Qubes 4.0 i got stuck with VPN (NordVPN) installation because i have
> only basic knowledge of linux.
>
> I found a lot of info, but most relevant are these from the Qubes Github:
>
>
Just ordered a (native - no USB conversion) Logitech PS/2 keyboard and mouse
and a PS/2 splitter since I only have one PS/2 port.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
On Sunday, December 16, 2018 at 4:12:56 AM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:31:35PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 6:24:49 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:18:43PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > >
On Sunday, December 16, 2018 at 4:11:14 AM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:13:49PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > Read some interesting things about USB on your site and now I want to
> > change over from USB keyboard and mouse to PS/2. My mobo ha
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 at 3:19:42 PM UTC-8, 我 wrote:
> Hello.
>
> When reading this list I thought G505s A10 is the best laptop for Qubes.
> So I'd like to purchase it, but I am wondering how many memory to put in.
>
> Could you give me some advice?
Memory is pretty cheap and it has a
Read some interesting things about USB on your site and now I want to change
over from USB keyboard and mouse to PS/2. My mobo has a single port that
combines both in what they (Gigabyte) describe as a PS/2 port. Can I just slap
an adapter onto my existing keyboard and mouse (say a PS/2 port
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 6:24:49 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:18:43PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 4:59:59 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 03:42:29PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > >
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 4:59:59 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 03:42:29PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:19:16 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> > > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-8, 22...@tutamai
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 4:47:19 PM UTC-8, unman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 03:19:15PM -0800, John Smiley wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-8, 22...@tutamail.com
> > wrote:
> > > Some typos corrected and clarification added:
Let's say we're talking specifically about the Fedora template. Are there
necessary/required/desirable configuration items that only persist when
upgrading (say from 26 to 28) or does a fresh install of 28 behave the same as
an upgraded 26? Are there additional steps that need to be taken
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:19:16 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-8, 22...@tutamail.com wrote:
> > Some typos corrected and clarification added:
> >
> >
> > John,
> > I'll take a shot at helping but would
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-8, 22...@tutamail.com wrote:
> Some typos corrected and clarification added:
>
>
> John,
> I'll take a shot at helping but would defer to Unman who has helped me out a
> lot, both directly and indirectly on this forum.
>
> Some notes:
> Been
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 1:09:59 AM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> I'm interested in what and in what order, upgrades should be applied starting
> from a base 4.0 install. I've tried several times and gotten jammed up each
> time. I've also tried starting with 4.0.1-rc1, but had
I'm interested in what and in what order, upgrades should be applied starting
from a base 4.0 install. I've tried several times and gotten jammed up each
time. I've also tried starting with 4.0.1-rc1, but had problems with that out
of the box where sys-whonix would die right away. 4.0 at least
Just finished looking at the new U2F support being added:
https://www.qubes-os.org/news/2018/09/11/qubes-u2f-proxy/
Any thoughts/plans to include Webauthn FIDO2 support at some point?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To
I thought that the TPM provided hardware accelerated block encryption ciphers
in addition to key storage. The Wikipedia page for TPM certainly makes it sound
that way but I can find nothing indicating that LUKS uses those capabilities
when present.
--
You received this message because you
So Xen just sets up LUKS without the TPM even if it’s there?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 8:21:43 PM UTC-8, John Smiley wrote:
> I only ask because my, admittedly limited, exposure left me with no
> confidence at all that it would protect me. I was hitting software and doc
> bugs left and right. They haven’t gotten basics down yet, so no
>From the docs:
TPM with proper BIOS support (required for Anti Evil Maid)
Is that it?
Qubes does not use the TPM for disk encryption?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
I only ask because my, admittedly limited, exposure left me with no confidence
at all that it would protect me. I was hitting software and doc bugs left and
right. They haven’t gotten basics down yet, so no way I can trust. Fun toy
though.
--
You received this message because you are
Diceware dude
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
61 matches
Mail list logo
