Re: [qubes-users] halfway to a certified hardware list

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:29 AM wrote: > My suggestions: > > 1) Manufacture Date is good...but more likely to be properly filled out > would be date of HCL submission/generation. :) Either should be in ISO 8601 > format of course. :) > > 2a) Remove (or hide/separate) all but the "currently in

Re: [qubes-users] Re: porting to ARM

. my initial motivation for ARM was that intel seemed more prone to #spectre than ARM; https://developer.arm.com/support/security-update "majority of Arm processors are not impacted by any variation of this side-channel speculation mechanism." and is ARM saddled with ME or SMM? ...not sure. I've

[qubes-users] porting to ARM

I notice there is Xen for ARM but no qubes for ARM; qubes Minimum is 64-bit Intel or AMD processor (x86_64 aka x64 aka AMD64) that is because the recommended is: Intel VT-d or AMD-Vi (aka AMD IOMMU) (Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) required for effective isolation of

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows 10?

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:39 PM, wrote: > > how did you remove cortana? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q990oW7JgvA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving