> So for me, EncFS seems the way to go I looked into using EncFS with Dropbox, but from what reading I did it seemed that EncFS was (1) old and not well maintained and (2) insecure whenever an attacker can see more than one version of the same file (that is, see the same file before and after a modification). Version 1.8 supposedly fixed some of the issues but this issue about being able to learn about a file's contents when it changes remains (as far as I can tell from reading around). Since Dropbox can always see files before and after modification (that's kind of the point of it), EncFS seems like an insecure choice to use with Dropbox.
So I'm still looking for a good solution for encrypting a single folder that will be synced. Of course, Dropbox itself would be considered a security risk by many who are interested in Qubes. Myself, I'd put up with it if I could localize it to a dedicated AppVM. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/de70f920-9f23-4745-8e59-08bd181242b8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
