Re: [qubes-users] Major problems with 3.2, devs must address

2016-10-09 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 09.10.2016 um 11:39 schrieb Pablo Costa: > (I usually manage CUPS with a browser to http://localhost:631 ) Real men don't use the web administration interface. Real men use vi. 8-) (Which, incidentally, is the only way to deal with CUPS without losing your mind). Achim -- You received

Re: [qubes-users] Major problems with 3.2, devs must address

2016-10-07 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 07.10.2016 um 06:44 schrieb boromirsbe...@sigaint.org: > Ok my concern mostly is because its my windows disk and i dont trust it, If you're not using a dedicated machine for Qubes instead of booting multiple operating systems with definitely lower security standards anyway I don't see your

Re: [qubes-users] Major problems with 3.2, devs must address

2016-10-06 Thread boromirsbeard
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2016-10-05 15:30, boromirsbe...@sigaint.org wrote: >> Alot of this is posted on the reddit.com/r/qubes board, there are alot >> of >> problems with 3.2, both security + function. >> >> >> 1. Dom0 is exposed to Sata connected drives. This

Re: [qubes-users] Major problems with 3.2, devs must address

2016-10-05 Thread Chris Laprise
On 10/05/2016 07:15 PM, Andrew David Wong wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-10-05 15:30, boromirsbe...@sigaint.org wrote: Alot of this is posted on the reddit.com/r/qubes board, there are alot of problems with 3.2, both security + function. 1. Dom0 is exposed to