Aug 14, 2022, 7:46 PM by 169...@gmail.com:
> Hello friends,
>
> Laptop w520 thinkpad corebooted.
>
> I would like to be able to use an external monitor connected by the
> displayport.
>
> This coreboot tutorial > https://www.coreboot.org/Board:lenovo/w520
> suggest to run the following
Hello,
schrieb am Di., 6. Aug. 2019, 00:42:
> So like installing coreboot should eliminate any malware installed at
> firmware levels, right?
>
I would not use the very strong claim "any", because I can't backup this
claim through knowledge (I am not a security specialist).
But using coreboot
So like installing coreboot should eliminate any malware installed at firmware
levels, right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks a lot for the reply. So if the previous owner’s dom0/laptop was
infected, it wouldn’t have any effect on me if I change the SSD and install
coreboot, am I understanding right? I apologise for my ignorance on this topic,
I’m learning only now.
--
You received this message because you
ljul8...@gmail.com:
> I was told that buying an used laptop represents an extra risk since the
> previous owner could have used the laptop with Qubes and got dom0 infected.
There's some terminology mixed up here. Qubes' dom0 is part of the
operating system, not the hardware. A Qubes dom0
Hello,
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 22:58, wrote:
> I was told that buying an used laptop represents an extra risk since the
> previous owner could have used the laptop with Qubes and got dom0 infected.
> After a little bit of research, I was told that installing coreboot would
> eliminate/delete any
System seventysuck, pur.idiots etc are LYING about having "open source
firmware"
System seventysuck also lies about having "made in usa" hardware
literally all they did was make a metal case here and somehow a metal
box equals a computer in their world.
Their "coreboot" is nothing more than a
Chris Laprise wrote on 4/6/19 2:08 PM:
On 3/30/19 3:47 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 7:10 PM:
BTW, like some other Qubers I got a G505s with the AMD A10. Still
need to figure out how to flash it.
Mike Banon's done some great work here. Check out
On 3/30/19 3:47 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 7:10 PM:
I agree. But even so, AMD are better by some noticeable margin.
Intel... OMGWTF. With the 'VISA' exploit they're contradicting the
researchers, and with 'Foreshadow' they said app programmers should
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 7:10 PM:
I agree. But even so, AMD are better by some noticeable margin.
Intel... OMGWTF. With the 'VISA' exploit they're contradicting the
researchers, and with 'Foreshadow' they said app programmers should deal
with it.
I saw that too WRT Foreshadow: "Just
On 3/30/19 12:25 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 2:44 AM:
On 3/29/19 7:18 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/system76/coreboot
Clearly they think they can handle modern hardware. Makes me wonder
why the coreboot folks have thrown up [their?]
Chris Laprise wrote on 3/30/19 2:44 AM:
On 3/29/19 7:18 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/system76/coreboot
Clearly they think they can handle modern hardware. Makes me wonder
why the coreboot folks have thrown up [their?] hands and declared defeat.
If I understand it right,
On 3/29/19 7:18 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/system76/coreboot
Clearly they think they can handle modern hardware. Makes me wonder why the
coreboot folks have thrown up Thierry hands and declared defeat.
Maybe they see something they can no longer stomach.
I bought my
https://github.com/system76/coreboot
Clearly they think they can handle modern hardware. Makes me wonder why the
coreboot folks have thrown up Thierry hands and declared defeat.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe
>From a recent System76 announcement:
“In firmware news, our engineer Jeremy has made a lot of progress in porting
Coreboot to the Darter Pro and multiple versions of Galago Pro. It can now run
both BIOS and UEFI implementations. However, certain bugs need to be worked out
before we can
On 3/28/19 3:51 PM, Sven Semmler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/25/19 4:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
What does this say about the direction Joanna and Golem are
taking?
I am severely confused about that. I'd have thought the direction to
go is open hardware,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/25/19 4:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> What does this say about the direction Joanna and Golem are
> taking?
I am severely confused about that. I'd have thought the direction to
go is open hardware, more local, more decentralized, more
What does this say about the direction Joanna and Golem are taking? Everyone
build clouds on Intel hardware. No getting around that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On 3/23/19 3:03 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Spent several hours yesterday trying to track down what I would need to do to
install coreboot on all of my computers, starting with my Qubes box: a Levnovo
Thinkpad T480.
The bottom line from what I can tell is that if you have an Intel CPU made
Hello,
schrieb am Mo., 25. März 2019, 02:15:
> That was one of the first places I looked. Maybe I’m just a hardhead, but
> I found it difficult to believe that there really was no support for
> coreboot in any form for modern hardware.
>
The problem seems to be that on modern hardware it is
That was one of the first places I looked. Maybe I’m just a hardhead, but I
found it difficult to believe that there really was no support for coreboot in
any form for modern hardware.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To
Hello,
schrieb am So., 24. März 2019, 10:11:
> On 2019-03-23 19:03, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Spent several hours yesterday trying to track down what I would need
> > to do to install coreboot on all of my computers, starting with my
> > Qubes box: a Levnovo Thinkpad T480.
[...]
> I'd
On 2019-03-23 19:03, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Spent several hours yesterday trying to track down what I would need
> to do to install coreboot on all of my computers, starting with my
> Qubes box: a Levnovo Thinkpad T480.
>
> The bottom line from what I can tell is that if you have an Intel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
799:
> > $ build/cbfstool build/coreboot.rom add-int -i 0 -n
> > etc/pci-optionrom-exec
>
> When do I need to run this? After building my Coreboot ROM?
Yes, see payloads/external/SeaBIOS/seabios/docs/Runtime_config.md for
a list of cbfs
Sorry, last Email send in advance while writing...
Hello Rusty,
Rusty Bird schrieb am Sa., 17. März 2018, 23:18:
SeaBIOS is nice. You can build it with CONFIG_SEABIOS_VGA_COREBOOT=y
> (might be the default now), and completely disable dynamic loading of
> any dubious
Hello Rusty,
Rusty Bird schrieb am Sa., 17. März 2018, 23:18:
>
> SeaBIOS is nice. You can build it with CONFIG_SEABIOS_VGA_COREBOOT=y
> (might be the default now), and completely disable dynamic loading of
> any dubious option ROMs:
>
> $ build/cbfstool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
799:
> Seabios or Grub and are there any special options which might make sense?
SeaBIOS is nice. You can build it with CONFIG_SEABIOS_VGA_COREBOOT=y
(might be the default now), and completely disable dynamic loading of
any dubious option ROMs:
On 11/06/2017 01:28 AM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
63xx/43xx is fine as long as you include a microcode update, you need to
use coreboot for those but it will do it automatically by default.
Is that only the case with Coreboot BIOS or also with the stock BIOS ?
Coreboot, not sure
> 63xx/43xx is fine as long as you include a microcode update, you need to
> use coreboot for those but it will do it automatically by default.
Is that only the case with Coreboot BIOS or also with the stock BIOS ?
> > I just told Holger I probably would postpone the installation of Coreboot,
On 11/04/2017 09:12 PM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
What is the difference between Coreboot and Libreboot ?
Philosophy, that's it.
Coreboot is sterile and corporate (as evidenced by not only the quiet
acceptance of boards with closed source init but the removal of older
open
On Sunday, November 5, 2017 at 1:55:04 AM UTC+1, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 11/04/2017 08:42 PM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
>
> > If I choose an older mainboard from AMD for example, which doesn't have all
> > those bad technologies built-in, I am still much more secure than the
> >
On Sunday, November 5, 2017 at 1:55:04 AM UTC+1, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 11/04/2017 08:42 PM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
>
> > If I choose an older mainboard from AMD for example, which doesn't have all
> > those bad technologies built-in, I am still much more secure than the
> >
> > What is the difference between Coreboot and Libreboot ?
> Philosophy, that's it.
>
> Coreboot is sterile and corporate (as evidenced by not only the quiet
> acceptance of boards with closed source init but the removal of older
> open source boards from the tree, most people in the project
On 11/04/2017 08:42 PM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
If I choose an older mainboard from AMD for example, which doesn't have all
those bad technologies built-in, I am still much more secure than the average
guy with a new Intel CPU, right ?
Yeah definitely.
For instance a H8SCM
On Sunday, November 5, 2017 at 12:10:26 AM UTC+1, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 03:53:32PM -0700, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users
> wrote:
> > so from my understanding, "blobs" is a synonym for proprietary code, right ?
>
> it's a synonym for "binary object" where in general
On 11/04/2017 01:57 PM, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
What is the difference between Coreboot and Libreboot ?
Philosophy, that's it.
Coreboot is sterile and corporate (as evidenced by not only the quiet
acceptance of boards with closed source init but the removal of older
open
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 03:53:32PM -0700, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
> so from my understanding, "blobs" is a synonym for proprietary code, right ?
it's a synonym for "binary object" where in general you don't have the
source code.
> I mean if it doesn't really matter for security I
On Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 10:47:12 PM UTC+1, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 10:57:30AM -0700, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users
> wrote:
> > What is the difference between Coreboot and Libreboot ?
>
> Libreboot is Coreboot with all the non-free blobs removed (and no free
>
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 10:57:30AM -0700, 'Marek Jenkins' via qubes-users wrote:
> What is the difference between Coreboot and Libreboot ?
Libreboot is Coreboot with all the non-free blobs removed (and no free
software added instead). So if you happen to have hardware which needs
those blobs, you
39 matches
Mail list logo