Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-24 Thread Chris Laprise
On 2/24/19 3:26 PM, 799 wrote: Hello Chris, On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 00:22, Chris Laprise > wrote: [...] As you may already know, I created a Qubes service that provides most of the benefits of a dispVM by removing, hash checking, repopulating or whi

Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-24 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 23/02/2019 10.58 AM, Stumpy wrote: > Hi, I was customizing my dvm templates and of course had to refer > to the docs (thanks doc maintainers/contributors!) and it > mentioned that dvms could be used for things like sys-net usb and > firewall w

Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-24 Thread 799
Hello Chris, On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 00:22, Chris Laprise wrote: > [...] > As you may already know, I created a Qubes service that provides most of > the benefits of a dispVM by removing, hash checking, repopulating or > whitelisting the contents of a VM's private volume: > > https://github.com/t

Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-23 Thread Chris Laprise
On 2/23/19 4:15 PM, 799 wrote: Hello, Stumpy mailto:stu...@posteo.net>> schrieb am Sa., 23. Feb. 2019, 17:58: (...) dvms could be used for things like sys-net usb and firewall which had never occured to me. I may not be thinking about it right but that seemed like a really goo

Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-23 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 10:15:32PM +0100, 799 wrote: > Hello, > > Stumpy schrieb am Sa., 23. Feb. 2019, 17:58: > > > (...) dvms could be used for things like sys-net usb and firewall which > > had never occured to me. > > I may not be thinking abo

Re: [qubes-users] disposible vms for sys-net, firewall, usb?

2019-02-23 Thread 799
Hello, Stumpy schrieb am Sa., 23. Feb. 2019, 17:58: > (...) dvms could be used for things like sys-net usb and firewall which > had never occured to me. > I may not be thinking about it right but that seemed like a really good > security idea, so my question is, why is that not the default? (...