Re: [qubes-users] btrfs for template/appvm

2020-12-12 Thread donoban
Hi, On 12/12/20 1:36 AM, 'keyandthegate' via qubes-users wrote: > I want to use btrfs for the snapshots feature in my appvms. > > I know Qubes supports btrfs for dom0: > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2340 > > > Does Qubes

[qubes-users] btrfs for template/appvm

2020-12-11 Thread 'keyandthegate' via qubes-users
I want to use btrfs for the snapshots feature in my appvms. I know Qubes supports btrfs for dom0: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2340 Does Qubes support using btrfs in individual appvms? If not is there some other way I can get snapshots? It would make me less afraid to make a

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-23 Thread Chris Laprise
On 09/23/2016 08:00 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:42:07AM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote: On 09/22/2016 07:12 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Sep 22,

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-23 Thread Chris Laprise
On 09/22/2016 07:12 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Connor Page wrote: In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with btrfs root if vm storage is expected to reside on a

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread Franz
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:59 PM, wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Connor Page wrote: > >> In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with > >> btrfs root if vm storage

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread johnyjukya
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Connor Page wrote: >> In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with >> btrfs root if vm storage is expected to reside on a LVM thin pool?" > > This is a good question. The

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Connor Page wrote: > In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with btrfs > root if vm storage is expected to reside on a LVM thin pool?" This is a good question. The new storage

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread Connor Page
In fact, I think the right question is "Will Qubes 4 be compatible with btrfs root if vm storage is expected to reside on a LVM thin pool?" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread Chris Laprise
On 09/22/2016 02:08 PM, se...@redhat.com wrote: On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 1:39:20 PM UTC-4, Chris Laprise wrote: On 09/22/2016 01:05 PM, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote: Has the Qubes team ever considered the use of btrfs? Qubes tools will even utilize btrfs reflinks where possible, so

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread sejug
On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 1:39:20 PM UTC-4, Chris Laprise wrote: > On 09/22/2016 01:05 PM, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote: > > Has the Qubes team ever considered the use of btrfs? > > > > Qubes tools will even utilize btrfs reflinks where possible, so hardly > any extra space is used when

Re: [qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread Chris Laprise
On 09/22/2016 01:05 PM, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote: Has the Qubes team ever considered the use of btrfs? Qubes tools will even utilize btrfs reflinks where possible, so hardly any extra space is used when you clone a template or other vm. Chris -- You received this message because you

[qubes-users] BTRFS?

2016-09-22 Thread johnyjukya
Has the Qubes team ever considered the use of btrfs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs It's been the default root FS for Suse since 2012: https://www.linux.com/news/suse-linux-says-btrfs-ready-rock While reading about its features (and using it) it seems like it would be especially

Re: [qubes-users] btrfs vs lvm?

2016-05-30 Thread Chris Laprise
On 05/30/2016 11:35 AM, Rusty Bird wrote: Bahtiar `kalkin-` Gadimov: IMHO you should use LVM. Because btrfs is IMHO not mature enough. (Personal anecdote warning) I used it for backups until the partion become read-only and throw out of space warnings, for no obvious reason. On Qubes 3.0, I