On 9/9/20 3:45 AM, Andrew David Wong wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2020-09-07 5:42 PM, Andrew David Wong wrote:
On 2020-09-05 12:35 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
If you're concerned about Fedora's lack of signing, switch to
Debian templates, or some other that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2020-09-07 5:42 PM, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-05 12:35 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
>> If you're concerned about Fedora's lack of signing, switch to
>> Debian templates, or some other that has signing.
>
> This is a misconcep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2020-09-05 12:35 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> If you're concerned about Fedora's lack of signing, switch to
> Debian templates, or some other that has signing.
This is a misconception. Fedora packages are absolutely
cryptographically sig
On 2020-09-05 13:35, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
Stumpy:
I was reminded about qubes hardening that Chris L has been working on
and also noticed that Patrick/Whonix is now basing whonix on thier
kicksecure distro and was trying (not so successfully) to absorb all of
this. I got the impression
Stumpy:
> I was reminded about qubes hardening that Chris L has been working on
> and also noticed that Patrick/Whonix is now basing whonix on thier
> kicksecure distro and was trying (not so successfully) to absorb all of
> this. I got the impression that Chris's work wouldnt jive so well with
> k
I was reminded about qubes hardening that Chris L has been working on
and also noticed that Patrick/Whonix is now basing whonix on thier
kicksecure distro and was trying (not so successfully) to absorb all of
this. I got the impression that Chris's work wouldnt jive so well with
kicksecure (fai
