Re: [qubes-users] No editor at all in 'fedora-36-minimal' template?

Nevermind, I stand corrected. Looks like I should use nano more often! :P On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:08:45PM +0100, 'unman' via qubes-users wrote: >On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:34:50AM -0700, Viktor Ransmayr wrote: >> Is it correct, that this template does not provide any editor 'package' at >>

Re: [qubes-users] No editor at all in 'fedora-36-minimal' template?

Hello Unman, Am So., 9. Okt. 2022 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb 'unman' via qubes-users < qubes-users@googlegroups.com>: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:34:50AM -0700, Viktor Ransmayr wrote: > > Is it correct, that this template does not provide any editor 'package' > at > > all? > > No, there's nano >

Re: [qubes-users] No editor at all in 'fedora-36-minimal' template?

Hi Victor, Yes, AFAIK this is expected. It is implied in that an editor like Vim is not pre-installed for Qubes OS's minimal templates (See "Distro-specific notes"). Best regards, Rifa On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:34:50AM -0700, Viktor Ransmayr

Re: [qubes-users] No editor at all in 'fedora-36-minimal' template?

On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:34:50AM -0700, Viktor Ransmayr wrote: > Is it correct, that this template does not provide any editor 'package' at > all? No, there's nano -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this

[qubes-users] No editor at all in 'fedora-36-minimal' template?

Is it correct, that this template does not provide any editor 'package' at all? I'm just wondering, if this is expected - and - I have to add for example 'vim-minimal' myself - or - if there's a specific issue with my installation / setup ... With kind regards, Viktor -- You received this