On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:59:18PM -0500, Steve Coleman wrote:
> On 02/27/18 10:24, Unman wrote:
>
> >
> > For 3.2 I have a Qubes Live that can be run from DVD/USB and generate HCL
> > from
> > that.
> > http://www.qubes-3isec.org
>
> Is that perhaps:
>
> http://qubes.3isec.org/Live/
>
On 02/27/18 10:24, Unman wrote:
For 3.2 I have a Qubes Live that can be run from DVD/USB and generate HCL from
that.
http://www.qubes-3isec.org
Is that perhaps:
http://qubes.3isec.org/Live/
http://qubes.3isec.org/Live/Qubes.iso
http://qubes.3isec.org/Live/QubesTor.iso
With a '.' rather
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions. I just thought it might be
something to consider if someone could re-purpose some of the code from Qubes
for a diagnostic that could help individuals (like myself) to quickly determine
and document (in the HCL) systems that are or are not
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 4:45:26 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote:
> On Tue, February 27, 2018 3:24 pm, Unman wrote:
>
> > To work efficiently,a program as
> > you envisage it would need to hold a database of board/processors to
> > provide accurate report, I think.
>
> That's true but it would be
On Tue, February 27, 2018 3:24 pm, Unman wrote:
> To work efficiently,a program as
> you envisage it would need to hold a database of board/processors to
> provide accurate report, I think.
That's true but it would be next to impossible to keep that database up to
date with errata about broken
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:40:49AM -0500, Don Hemminger wrote:
> The boot up report is very helpful, but if it could be run outside of
> Qubes, it would be quicker, and could provide comprehensive specific
> details (e.g. TPM 1.2 or 2.0) on specific platforms. I'm not sure how
> feasible that
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:40:53 PM UTC+1, Don Hemminger wrote:
> The boot up report is very helpful, but if it could be run outside of Qubes,
> it would be quicker, and could provide comprehensive specific details (e.g.
> TPM 1.2 or 2.0) on specific platforms. I'm not sure how feasible
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:40:53 PM UTC+1, Don Hemminger wrote:
> The boot up report is very helpful, but if it could be run outside of Qubes,
> it would be quicker, and could provide comprehensive specific details (e.g.
> TPM 1.2 or 2.0) on specific platforms. I'm not sure how feasible
The boot up report is very helpful, but if it could be run outside of
Qubes, it would be quicker, and could provide comprehensive specific
details (e.g. TPM 1.2 or 2.0) on specific platforms. I'm not sure how
feasible that would be. It's just a suggestion.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:19 AM, awokd
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:19:11 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote:
> On Tue, February 27, 2018 2:08 pm, Don Hemminger wrote:
> > Would it be possible to create a simple diagnostic that could be run on a
> > PC to summarize the Qubes Hardware Compatibility of that machine. It
> > could quickly
On Tue, February 27, 2018 2:08 pm, Don Hemminger wrote:
> Would it be possible to create a simple diagnostic that could be run on a
> PC to summarize the Qubes Hardware Compatibility of that machine. It
> could quickly diagnose and report on the compatibility level of each major
> requirement
Would it be possible to create a simple diagnostic that could be run on a
PC to summarize the Qubes Hardware Compatibility of that machine. It could
quickly diagnose and report on the compatibility level of each major
requirement (e.g HVM, IOMMU, TPM 1.2 or 2.0), and indicate possible issues
or
12 matches
Mail list logo
