[qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-10-22 Thread Theo
On Monday, 18 September 2017 13:33:31 UTC-7, alexc...@gmail.com wrote: > Has anyone here successfully disabled the Intel ME yet? Purism says they are diabling it by default on all laptops they are sending out now. Ref: https://puri.sm/posts/deep-dive-into-intel-me-disablement/ Now if only

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-25 Thread pixel fairy
i would find a list of annoyances with qubes 4 on a librem 15 helpful. im thinking of getting one. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-25 Thread Sean Hunter
> On 25 Sep 2017, at 07:45, rysiek wrote: > > These are not really good options for laptops. :( I am running Qubes 4.0 rc 1 on a librem purism 15v3. I believe (may be wrong) that it comes with ME disabled. Seems a great laptop so far with a couple of small annoyances

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-25 Thread Alex
On 09/25/2017 08:45 AM, rysiek wrote: > Dnia Sunday, September 24, 2017 9:23:06 PM EEST filtration pisze: >> My motherboard has a "Disable ME" jumper. Not good enough for many >> of you, I know. >> >> As far as AMT, apparently the entry is through Intel NICs. I hoped >> to mitigate it by using a

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-25 Thread rysiek
Dnia Sunday, September 24, 2017 9:23:06 PM EEST filtration pisze: > My motherboard has a "Disable ME" jumper. Not good enough for many of > you, I know. > > As far as AMT, apparently the entry is through Intel NICs. I hoped to > mitigate it by using a third party NIC. The Intel device stayed lit

[qubes-users] Re: Anyone disabled the Intel ME yet?

2017-09-24 Thread filtration
cooloutac: > On Sunday, September 24, 2017 at 8:24:44 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote: >> On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 12:08:41 PM UTC-4, Hugo Costa wrote: >>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 07:23:01 UTC+1, Alex wrote: Replying to this thread to report that somebody DID ACTUALLY find an