I looked at that. Its a pretty cool direction. I had read some article that
said they were teaming up with a provider that offered end-to-end encryption
so you get the whole kit and caboodle. I wanted to install something less
offensive on my galaxy, but it turns out Verizon phones are trash and
On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 8:11:57 PM UTC-4, awokd wrote:
> On Sun, March 11, 2018 5:49 pm, sevas wrote:
> > I did not mean to go so far south with the above statements. So heres my
> > additions for alternatives...
> >
> > CopperheadOS is doing a project still early in the making on reawakening
I do find that very interesting and Ive saved the website for further
investigation a little later. Thanks for that!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
On Sun, March 11, 2018 5:49 pm, sevas wrote:
> I did not mean to go so far south with the above statements. So heres my
> additions for alternatives...
>
> CopperheadOS is doing a project still early in the making on reawakening
> the open source kernel hardening. The GitHub page can be found
I don't see the issue with the pax devs being anonymous as then it is
much more difficult for someone to put political pressure on them to
demand they insert a backdoor or approve some type of undesired change -
ex: why do you think almost every linux distro switched to systemd
overnight?
--
I did not mean to go so far south with the above statements. So heres my
additions for alternatives...
CopperheadOS is doing a project still early in the making on reawakening
the open source kernel hardening. The GitHub page can be found here:
https://github.com/copperhead/linux-hardened/issues
I did not mean to go so far south with the above statements. So heres my
additions for alternatives...
CopperheadOS is doing a project still early in the making on reawakening
the open source kernel hardening. The GitHub page can be found here:
