Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-17 Thread johnyjukya
>> Now, about 4.7. Note that the page for only lists individual names, >> does >> not list any company affiliations or employers at all. An odd >> change/omission? > > could there be a simpler explanation? Certainly. Maybe some intern generating the stats page was too lazy to summarize it by

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:12:52PM -, johnyju...@sigaint.org wrote: > Lines of code added/removed: interesting numbers, thanks for posting them here. > Now, about 4.7. Note that the page for only lists individual names, does > not list any company affiliations or employers at all. An odd >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-17 Thread johnyjukya
>> 1) XEN is developed by people working for a company based in >> the U.S. Some fun stats for Xen 4.6 changesets, as used by Cubes: Lines of Code: ~150,000 This is from https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_4.6_Acknowledgements and related pages (and similar pages with 4.6 replaced by

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-16 Thread raahelps
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 10:28:24 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: > You mentioned some good points about QubesOS. One thing I definitely dislike > about QubesOS (and that's no offense of course - it's simply unavoidable, and > of course that's not the developers' fault - in contrast I

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-15 Thread QubesOS User
You mentioned some good points about QubesOS. One thing I definitely dislike about QubesOS (and that's no offense of course - it's simply unavoidable, and of course that's not the developers' fault - in contrast I couldn't imagine how they could optimize it even more [maybe one could do so as a

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-15 Thread QubesOS User
16.10.2016, 01:03, "raahe...@gmail.com" : > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: >>  Hello everyone, >> >>  I could imagine that this question has been discussed before already, and >> if this should be the case, then I'm very sorry for

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-15 Thread raahelps
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 9:16:52 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: > 16.10.2016, 01:03, "raahe...@gmail.com" : > > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: > >>  Hello everyone, > >> > >>  I could imagine that this question has been discussed

[qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-15 Thread raahelps
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 7:04:46 PM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I could imagine that this question

[qubes-users] Re: Maybe a provocative question

2016-10-15 Thread raahelps
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-4, QubesOS User wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I could imagine that this question has been discussed before already, and if > this should be the case, then I'm very sorry for posting this (I'd be > thankful for an according link if so though). > >