[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-23 Thread 4p6c0u+8ayokp4u2bj90 via qubes-users
Thank you Marek. I was not able to put this to work via the network manager,since if I opt to choose eth0 this the connection will not be activated. And create a dedicated virtual interface just for this purpose its a little overkill. Therefore I followed your second suggestion and added the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-23 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:56:56PM +, 4p3dkf+6lmws56jxixyk via qubes-users wrote: > Yes, the symlink is in place: > > ls /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections > 131205 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 17 21:17 >

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-23 Thread 4p3dkf+6lmws56jxixyk via qubes-users
I'm sorry for my bad temper, but given the amount of days that I'm involved on this issue, waiting for a simple reply (since this is inherent of the Qubes design and therefore easy to answer by any of the devs) I got a little frustrated. I didn't mean to be

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-23 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-10-22 16:23, 4ok80g+4fl8s3n7pesd8 via qubes-users wrote: > So far not a single soul from the qubes project has mentioned a single word > about this and this is simply unacceptable! This mailing list is been > abandoned! Please review the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-22 Thread Unman
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:23:18PM +, 4ok80g+4fl8s3n7pesd8 via qubes-users wrote: > I assume you meant to say rc.local, as this has nothing to do with iptables > nor the qubes-firewall-user-script. > In any case, this suggestion in itself is a huge hammering. The sys-firewall > shouldn't

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-22 Thread 4ok80g+4fl8s3n7pesd8 via qubes-users
I assume you meant to say rc.local, as this has nothing to do with iptables nor the qubes-firewall-user-script. In any case, this suggestion in itself is a huge hammering. The sys-firewall shouldn't have to change the qubes-uplink-eth0 (Network Manager configuration) in the first place and that

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-22 Thread Adrian Rocha
Hi, Did you try adding the commands in /rw/config/qubes-firewall-user-script file, as is indicated in the documentation? https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/qubes-firewall/ Regards El sábado, 22 de octubre de 2016, 12:54:54 (UTC-6), 4oe3ad+c69...@guerrillamail.com escribió: > Unfortunately this

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-22 Thread 4oe3ad+c69c7b873rbzk via qubes-users
Unfortunately this Mialing list seems dead. I've opened this issue, that is specific to the Qubes architecture, for over a week now and so far no one was able to pinpoint to the solution or explain why static routes are being overwritten on boot. It seems that this ML is only breathing,

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-20 Thread 4mytxq+3qzp0wnr1px58 via qubes-users
bump Does anyone knows how to achieve this on Qubes? Sent using Guerrillamail.com Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com/abuse/?a=UFR2AB5NVqcQmh2U93EQdRjCStifx8dDiadNcQ%3D%3D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users"

[qubes-users] Re: Persistant routes on Qubes are not persistant?!

2016-10-17 Thread 4m3ap1+btc4yln3rc8lw via qubes-users
Hi, Does anyone knows how to achieve this on Qubes? Thanks Sent using GuerrillaMail.com Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com/abuse/?a=UFR2AB5NVqcQmh2U93EQdRjCStifx8dDiadNcQ%3D%3D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups